Originally posted by twhitehead
Are you serious? We have been conversing all this time in a number of threads and you still don't know what the word evolution means even in the slightest? When has anyone ever claimed it is the answer to all creation? I certainly haven't.
[b]And in my mine, such as it is, I am unwilling to give up something that
makes common sense to me and many oth ...[text shortened]... the crap slinging contest? If so, then just let me know and I will leave the thread alone.
I put a definition of evolution along with other definitions related to it
from the Random House Word Menu that was acceptable to me on a
thread or two earlier and no one would accept them. You apparently
have not payed attention or you just like to argue. Even Proper Knob
would not say if he agreed with the definitions or not. Then we have
Andrew Hamilton spouting off about how we might have evolved from
from apes in the distant past and giving me links where they believed
they had a breakthrough experiment when they were able to change
a gene in a shrimp so it produced some shrimps with less legs. This
was somehow supposed to be evidence for macroevolution or maybe
backward evolution. Then someone gave me the link to an article in
Nature that was supposed to be a peer review of the above experiment.
And I quess since they also used fruit flies in the experiments the
article was titled, "Turning Lobsters into Fruit Flies." Where the lobsters
came in I don't know. I have to see it to believe it. If you think I
don't know anything about evolution or what it is, You certainly have
not been any help. All you want to do is argue, criticize, and call me
dishonest.