Originally posted by RJHinds You were being dishonest with me, by pretending you were a Christian
with authority to criticize me as behaving in a non-Christian manner.
Now you say God does not even exist. What a hypocrite, just like the
Pharisee. 😏
l have never ever once pretended to be a christian - it is your inability to read that cause your error.
Originally posted by josephw Get the coffee going would ya? 😉
If you knew there was, God, then you'd understand.
The idea that one can [b]know there is no "God" is not possible. Therefore it is an irrational mindset.[/b]
The idea that one can know there is no "God" is not possible. Course we can - I know that 5 faced cubes don't exist. Haven't checked every nook and cranny of the universe just to be sure they aren't hiding anywhere yet I'm still absolutely sure they don't.
Originally posted by Agerg [b]The idea that one can know there is no "God" is not possible. Course we can - I know that 5 faced cubes don't exist. Haven't checked every nook and cranny of the universe just to be sure they aren't hiding anywhere yet I'm still absolutely sure they don't.
The same is true of your silly "God".[/b]
If it were possible to be 100% sure there was no god, there would be no theists. Your agrument that you are 100% sure is surely no more robust than someone saying they are 100% sure god does exist.
In fact I would go further; of the 2 groups there is only the possiblity of a (hypothetical) theist being 100% sure god exists, in the the case that god does actually exist and makes himself irrefutably know to that theist.
In the case of a (hypothetical) atheit and there being no god; he can never be 100% sure there is no god, as there is no evidence to say there is no god; just a lack of current evidence to suggest their is a god.
Originally posted by divegeester If it were possible to be 100% sure there was no god, there would be no theists. Your agrument that you are 100% sure is surely no more robust than someone saying they are 100% sure god does exist.
In fact I would go further; of the 2 groups there is only the possiblity of a (hypothetical) theist being 100% sure god exists, in the the case that god ...[text shortened]... s no evidence to say there is no god; just a lack of current evidence to suggest their is a god.
Importantly I never said there was no god (or gods); I said "God".
If I'm presented with a logically inconsistent construction of "God" then to remain honest, I ought to dismiss it as easily as I dismiss square triangles and such.
Originally posted by RJHinds I try to teach the truth of what is in the Holy Bible. I do not teach that Jesus
was crucified on Friday in contradiction to the scriptures as you probably
do. I do not know what other false beliefs about Christianity you may
hold for you are not a witness for Christ as you should be. You attack
those like me that wish to do so because we do not do it ...[text shortened]... h. What makes you a judge, like the Pharisee,
to determine the right way to witness of Christ?
Are you talking about yourself again. You are more like the Pharisees than anyone else on this forum( There may be one who beats you)
Originally posted by RJHinds You were being dishonest with me, by pretending you were a Christian
with authority to criticize me as behaving in a non-Christian manner.
Now you say God does not even exist. What a hypocrite, just like the
Pharisee. 😏
Originally posted by nook7 l have never ever once pretended to be a christian - it is your inability to read that cause your error.
Unlike you l am not a fraud.
You were criticizing my Christian behavior as if you were some kind of
an authority on Christian behavior and you do not even believe in God.
That seems like a hypocrite and a fraud to me. Spanky. 😏
Originally posted by RJHinds You were criticizing my Christian behavior as if you were some kind of
an authority on Christian behavior and you do not even believe in God.
That seems like a hypocrite and a fraud to me. Spanky. 😏
if we take the new testament as the authority on what it means to be christian, it is easy to determine that you're a fraud.
Originally posted by RJHinds You were criticizing my Christian behavior as if you were some kind of
an authority on Christian behavior and you do not even believe in God.
That seems like a hypocrite and a fraud to me. Spanky. 😏
You are laughable.
l was criticising your behaviour as you are and were acting like a complete twat.
You need to learn to separate whatever thoughts are running through your head with the reality that exists outside it.
l could never believe in a God that allows someone like you to represent it.
Originally posted by Agerg [b]The idea that one can know there is no "God" is not possible. Course we can - I know that 5 faced cubes don't exist. Haven't checked every nook and cranny of the universe just to be sure they aren't hiding anywhere yet I'm still absolutely sure they don't.
The same is true of your silly "God".[/b]
Your denial of the existence of God - as presented by false religion is accepted.
However your denial of an intelligent/creative first cause ( God).........is not accepted and is thoroughly foolish and dishonest.
Originally posted by divegeester If it were possible to be 100% sure there was no god, there would be no theists.
How on earth do you come to that conclusion? Of course there are people who believe things that others are 100% sure are not true. It is even possible for two people to be 100% sure that the other person is wrong. At most, only one will be correct, but that doesn't mean the other will instantly convert.
Your agrument that you are 100% sure is surely no more robust than someone saying they are 100% sure god does exist. So you say, but you must present an argument as to why the two claims are equivalent.
Originally posted by FMF When are you going to apologize for what you wrote in your deleted 19th December "genocide" thread?
No, he won't apologise for the 'Genocide' thread. He's quite happy with it. He thinks its perfectly fine to kill all the members of a particular race or religion.
28 Jan '12 12:25
Dishonesty
Back to Top