1. Standard memberDasa
    Dasa
    Account suspended
    Joined
    20 May '10
    Moves
    8042
    03 Apr '16 15:24
    When a person who we all know despise,s the Vedas, they must not start posting up random verses etc. unless they can give the history of the translator.

    OK...........thanks
  2. SubscriberGhost of a Duke
    A Spirited Misfit
    in London
    Joined
    14 Mar '15
    Moves
    8519
    03 Apr '16 16:31
    Originally posted by Dasa
    When a person who we all know despise,s the Vedas, they must not start posting up random verses etc. unless they can give the history of the translator.

    OK...........thanks
    If the Vedas are perfect, as you claim, it is not unreasonable to have you defend this perfection, especially as you are quick to point to the imperfections in the religious writings of other religions.

    Why fear discussing 'random verses' if the Vedas in their entirety are perfect?
  3. Joined
    16 Feb '08
    Moves
    86339
    03 Apr '16 16:32
    Originally posted by Dasa
    When a person who we all know despise,s the Vedas, they must not start posting up random verses etc. unless they can give the history of the translator.

    OK...........thanks
    Stop spamming up the forum you blithering hatefilled idiot 😠
  4. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    03 Apr '16 16:39
    Originally posted by Dasa
    When a person who we all know despise,s the Vedas, they must not start posting up random verses etc. unless they can give the history of the translator.

    OK...........thanks
    When a person has an objection to something, please would that person say so in the thread in which it came up, rather than spamming the forum with new threads.

    As for what a person must not do, you do not have the authority to make those demands nor the power to enforce them.

    And, although you clearly love the vedas, you have not read them, do not understand the message in them, and do not represent them nor own them. On top of all that you frequently lie about them.
  5. SubscriberGhost of a Duke
    A Spirited Misfit
    in London
    Joined
    14 Mar '15
    Moves
    8519
    03 Apr '16 16:47
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    When a person has an objection to something, please would that person say so in the thread in which it came up, rather than spamming the forum with new threads.

    As for what a person [b]must not
    do, you do not have the authority to make those demands nor the power to enforce them.

    And, although you clearly love the vedas, you have not read them, ...[text shortened]... them, and do not represent them nor own them. On top of all that you frequently lie about them.[/b]
    The irony is that last week Dasa cut and paste large chunks of the Vedas into the forums and concluded by saying 'source not important.'

    It appears the source is only important when somebody else quotes the Vedas. 😕
  6. Standard memberGrampy Bobby
    Boston Lad
    USA
    Joined
    14 Jul '07
    Moves
    43012
    03 Apr '16 16:54
    Originally posted by Dasa
    When a person who we all know despise,s the Vedas, they must not start posting up random verses etc. unless they can give the history of the translator.

    OK...........thanks
    Originally posted by Dasa
    "Dont do it"

    .¿
  7. Standard memberDasa
    Dasa
    Account suspended
    Joined
    20 May '10
    Moves
    8042
    03 Apr '16 17:14
    Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
    If the Vedas are perfect, as you claim, it is not unreasonable to have you defend this perfection, especially as you are quick to point to the imperfections in the religious writings of other religions.

    Why fear discussing 'random verses' if the Vedas in their entirety are perfect?
    Did you understand what I just said?................you did not

    I said you must give the translators details..

    If you don't then it is not accepted as Veda
  8. Standard memberDasa
    Dasa
    Account suspended
    Joined
    20 May '10
    Moves
    8042
    03 Apr '16 17:16
    Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
    The irony is that last week Dasa cut and paste large chunks of the Vedas into the forums and concluded by saying 'source not important.'

    It appears the source is only important when somebody else quotes the Vedas. 😕
    That's right

    When a dog like your self starts post Vedas it becomes poisoned.

    Vedas are for humans only.

    Atheists are not human.
  9. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    03 Apr '16 17:27
    Originally posted by Dasa
    Did you understand what I just said?................you did not

    I said you must give the translators details..

    If you don't then it is not accepted as Veda
    You are not the arbiter of what is, or is not Veda. You are just some guy in Australia who is fascinated by some ancient Indian writing but although you believe they were writing in the 'perfect language' of Sanskrit, you have not bothered to actually learn Sanskrit.
    In addition although you claim that the Vedas contain superior science to what scientists today have, the Vedas apparently don't have any cures for pain, so instead you take medication created by imperfect doctors and it apparently has messed up your mind to the point where you insult everyone you talk to.
  10. SubscriberGhost of a Duke
    A Spirited Misfit
    in London
    Joined
    14 Mar '15
    Moves
    8519
    03 Apr '16 17:56
    Originally posted by Dasa
    That's right

    When a dog like your self starts post Vedas it becomes poisoned.

    Vedas are for humans only.

    Atheists are not human.
    Insults seem to be your default position when logic escapes you.

    You said previously that you don't like being ' intolerable to converse with.' Sorry to report sir, but you are once again, intolerable to converse with.
Back to Top