- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29595
03 Apr 16
Originally posted by DasaIf the Vedas are perfect, as you claim, it is not unreasonable to have you defend this perfection, especially as you are quick to point to the imperfections in the religious writings of other religions.
When a person who we all know despise,s the Vedas, they must not start posting up random verses etc. unless they can give the history of the translator.
OK...........thanks
Why fear discussing 'random verses' if the Vedas in their entirety are perfect?
03 Apr 16
Originally posted by DasaWhen a person has an objection to something, please would that person say so in the thread in which it came up, rather than spamming the forum with new threads.
When a person who we all know despise,s the Vedas, they must not start posting up random verses etc. unless they can give the history of the translator.
OK...........thanks
As for what a person must not do, you do not have the authority to make those demands nor the power to enforce them.
And, although you clearly love the vedas, you have not read them, do not understand the message in them, and do not represent them nor own them. On top of all that you frequently lie about them.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29595
03 Apr 16
Originally posted by twhiteheadThe irony is that last week Dasa cut and paste large chunks of the Vedas into the forums and concluded by saying 'source not important.'
When a person has an objection to something, please would that person say so in the thread in which it came up, rather than spamming the forum with new threads.
As for what a person [b]must not do, you do not have the authority to make those demands nor the power to enforce them.
And, although you clearly love the vedas, you have not read them, ...[text shortened]... them, and do not represent them nor own them. On top of all that you frequently lie about them.[/b]
It appears the source is only important when somebody else quotes the Vedas. 😕
03 Apr 16
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeDid you understand what I just said?................you did not
If the Vedas are perfect, as you claim, it is not unreasonable to have you defend this perfection, especially as you are quick to point to the imperfections in the religious writings of other religions.
Why fear discussing 'random verses' if the Vedas in their entirety are perfect?
I said you must give the translators details..
If you don't then it is not accepted as Veda
03 Apr 16
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeThat's right
The irony is that last week Dasa cut and paste large chunks of the Vedas into the forums and concluded by saying 'source not important.'
It appears the source is only important when somebody else quotes the Vedas. 😕
When a dog like your self starts post Vedas it becomes poisoned.
Vedas are for humans only.
Atheists are not human.
03 Apr 16
Originally posted by DasaYou are not the arbiter of what is, or is not Veda. You are just some guy in Australia who is fascinated by some ancient Indian writing but although you believe they were writing in the 'perfect language' of Sanskrit, you have not bothered to actually learn Sanskrit.
Did you understand what I just said?................you did not
I said you must give the translators details..
If you don't then it is not accepted as Veda
In addition although you claim that the Vedas contain superior science to what scientists today have, the Vedas apparently don't have any cures for pain, so instead you take medication created by imperfect doctors and it apparently has messed up your mind to the point where you insult everyone you talk to.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29595
03 Apr 16
Originally posted by DasaInsults seem to be your default position when logic escapes you.
That's right
When a dog like your self starts post Vedas it becomes poisoned.
Vedas are for humans only.
Atheists are not human.
You said previously that you don't like being ' intolerable to converse with.' Sorry to report sir, but you are once again, intolerable to converse with.