Everyone believes in God whether they admit it or not

@kingdavid403 said
Just look at the tangent you went on.

Well, here it is now. You can't call a thread topic, in and of itself, a "tangent". You shouldn't run away from this claim you have made.

@kingdavid403 said
Who did I insist this to?
you.
Why?
To counter-troll you and piss you off.

You can "troll" all you want. But you have not succeeded in pissing me off.

You have, however, asserted this: "I feel there is some truth in my statement." Don't run away.

@fmf said
You can "troll" all you want. But you have not succeeded in pissing me off.

You have, however, asserted this: "I feel there is some truth in my statement." Don't run away.

It is what it is; and, according to your tangent, It did piss you off.
I'm not running anywhere; and, I HAVE answered all your questions.
Face it, you got trolled good; and, it worked. 🙂
Now, maybe not be such a troll next time to opposing views and, educationally add to the discussions for us all.
Your trolling does get annoying sometimes. Especially at three in the morning.

@kingdavid403 said
It is what it is; and, according to your tangent, It did piss you off.
I'm not running anywhere; and, I HAVE answered all your questions.
Face it, you got trolled good; and, it worked. 🙂
Now, maybe not be such a troll next time to opposing views, and educationally add to the discussions.

I haven't done any "trolling" here. And I am not pissed off. The so-called "tangent" is yours ~ I moved it here to a thread of its own ~ where the key assertion is yours and where it is no longer a tangent. You don't need to "troll" people. You are selling yourself short.

@fmf said
I haven't done any "trolling" here. And I am not pissed off. The so-called "tangent" is yours ~ I moved it here to a thread of its own ~ where the key assertion is yours and where it is no longer a tangent. You don't need to "troll" people. You are selling yourself short.

Nice try, but nope.
End of your story and your tangent; for I anyway.
See ya ... 😉

@fmf said
I thought this kind of rhetoric was a thing of the past now that sonship has (apparently) left.

Who thinks it is a persuasive assertion?

A pointless assertion, as the term "god" is not rigorously defined. But that is a feature, not a bug: without a fixed definition, the notion of "god" can be shaped to fit any occasion, and to an extent that may render the assertion a mere tautology. The universe could be "god"; the laws of physics could be "god".