evidence in support of the bible

Genesis 19:24 - Then the lord rained down burning sulfur on sodom and Gomorrah from the lord out of the heavens



YouTube

Originally posted by tim88
Genesis 19:24 - Then the lord rained down burning sulfur on sodom and Gomorrah from the lord out of the heavens



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwTVFk1HK3Y

HAS THE MOUTAIN OF MOSES BEEN FOUND? MAYBE. Take a look.

YouTube&feature=related

http://www.arkdiscovery.com/mt__sinai_found.htm

Originally posted by RJHinds
HAS THE MOUTAIN OF MOSES BEEN FOUND? MAYBE. Take a look.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3cB6I7Tjz0&feature=related

http://www.arkdiscovery.com/mt__sinai_found.htm

it's very interesting! i would like to see more investigation on it!

dasa?

googlefudge! do you have something to say?

googlefudge dont like this?

Originally posted by RJHinds
HAS THE MOUTAIN OF MOSES BEEN FOUND? MAYBE. Take a look.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3cB6I7Tjz0&feature=related

http://www.arkdiscovery.com/mt__sinai_found.htm

i have seen this before, it is a shame that they block it off so no one can see it. i wonder why that is?

Originally posted by RJHinds
HAS THE MOUTAIN OF MOSES BEEN FOUND? MAYBE. Take a look.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3cB6I7Tjz0&feature=related

http://www.arkdiscovery.com/mt__sinai_found.htm

i dont know much about biblical archaeology so cant offer much in the way of my own opinion, but i stumbled on this while reading about the subject. i though you might be interested as it offers a different opinion also from a christian point of view.

http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2008/06/Is-Mount-Sinai-in-Saudi-Arabia.aspx#Article

Originally posted by tim88
Genesis 19:24 - Then the lord rained down burning sulfur on sodom and Gomorrah from the lord out of the heavens



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwTVFk1HK3Y

The extreme heat came from volcanoes which happened in the deep past way before mankind came around. I walked the hills of Masada several times and saw all that and it looked to me like the remains of volcanic activity.

If you turn left from looking at the sulfur you can see the remains of the roman armies that attacked Masada. I lived in Israel for 4 years and saw a whole lot of it as you can imagine.

The fire and brimstone came from volcanoes. Sorry, I doubt very much your mind would be changed but that's the fact of the thing. BTW, they present those features as if they were buildings, they are definitely NOT buildings, they are left over features that were a little bit stronger and are still there after many eons of weathering.

They could cut those structures up all the way through top to bottom and find nothing but sulfur and such, not a building at all. The charcoal they found made them convinced they were the remains of buildings but if so you would find more than one square inch, like boards burned up ten feet long if it was a building. There are always tree stumps and such in volcanic magma. They just made up suppositions based on fairy tales. Those features were there way longer than mankind was a twinkle in the Earth's eye.

If you don't think sulfur can come from volcanoes look at this link:
http://www.stormchaser.ca/Volcanoes/Kawah_Ijen/Kawah_Ijen.html

http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/hazards/gas/index.php

Originally posted by RBHILL
i have seen this before, it is a shame that they block it off so no one can see it. i wonder why that is?

The Muslims want to eliminate the history of Israel, I suspect. They
would rather nothing come out about it because they believe the true
line from Abraham chosen by God of the Savior of the world is through
Ishmael.

http://www.keyway.ca/htm2002/ishmael.htm

Originally posted by tim88
Genesis 19:24 - Then the lord rained down burning sulfur on sodom and Gomorrah from the lord out of the heavens



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwTVFk1HK3Y

wrong conclusion derived from circumstantial evidence. it is not uncommon for primitive people (and even some modern backwards ones) who witness natural/casual disasters and attribute them to some supernatural force of their preference.

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
wrong conclusion derived from circumstantial evidence. it is not uncommon for primitive people (and even some modern backwards ones) who witness natural/casual disasters and attribute them to some supernatural force of their preference.

But there is an account written in the Holy Bible that says cities were
destroyed in a manner like this. A volcano may have produced this if
you prefer, but does that prove the cities never existed because you
think it was not described as you would have done it?

Originally posted by RJHinds
But there is an account written in the Holy Bible that says cities were
destroyed in a manner like this. A volcano may have produced this if
you prefer, but does that prove the cities never existed because you
think it was not described as you would have done it?

I never said those cities never existed. Where did you get that idea? I said if those structures were the remains of buildings, the charcoal remains would have been a lot more than 1 square inch. Try getting your reading comprehension down before making these statements.

Originally posted by sonhouse
I never said those cities never existed. Where did you get that idea? I said if those structures were the remains of buildings, the charcoal remains would have been a lot more than 1 square inch. Try getting your reading comprehension down before making these statements.

My reply was directed at VoidSpirit.