Go back
Evolution in Action?

Evolution in Action?

Spirituality

DC
Flamenco Sketches

Spain, in spirit

Joined
09 Sep 04
Moves
59422
Clock
20 Dec 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Could the life cycle of a frog not be considered a microcosm of the evolutionary process? What about the metamorphosis of a butterfly?

s
Kichigai!

Osaka

Joined
27 Apr 05
Moves
8592
Clock
20 Dec 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by David C
Could the life cycle of a frog not be considered a microcosm of the evolutionary process? What about the metamorphosis of a butterfly?
Nope, no selection pressure. No selective death. It is a wonderful developmental process though and is indicative of the organisms that we evolved from. For example, during the embryonic phase all mammals exhibit a fish-like phase, with tail and everything...

edit; actually, I should say all chordates, rather than all mammals, although the mammals are a subdivision of the chordata. They / we also have gills during development...

DC
Flamenco Sketches

Spain, in spirit

Joined
09 Sep 04
Moves
59422
Clock
20 Dec 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scottishinnz
Nope, no selection pressure. No selective death. It is a wonderful developmental process though and is indicative of the organisms that we evolved from. For example, during the embryonic phase all mammals exhibit a fish-like phase, with tail and everything...

edit; actually, I should say all chordates, rather than all mammals, although the mammals are a subdivision of the chordata. They / we also have gills during development...
Selection pressure or selective death aside, this is the process, right? Brain pan expands, lungs develop, leg bones form, etc.?

Nemesio
Ursulakantor

Pittsburgh, PA

Joined
05 Mar 02
Moves
34824
Clock
20 Dec 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scottishinnz
For example, during the embryonic phase all mammals exhibit a fish-like phase, with tail and everything...
I seem to recall that your conclusion -- that the embryonic phases like the fish-like
one support evolution on some scale -- is spurious. I mean, doctors studying biology
before the common era have been looking at miscarriages and surmising that we
were higher on the hierarchy of animals because we can see fish-phase, lizard-phase
or whatever.

I don't know much about embryonic development and what these phases entail, I
just remember that the 'we can see our evolutionary history in embryos' claim was
not well respected.

Or I could be totally inventing a memory!

Nemesio

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.