Originally posted by vivifyDon't know what that is about but if sincere; kudos to you.
I'm sorry. I apologize. I was completely out of line for what I said, and you didn't deserve that. I truly, truly feel bad for what I said. I was an a-hole.
I'm sorry.
If not sincere then you are the a-hole.
I hope the former.
Originally posted by wolfgang59Vivify started a thread asking for Biblical topics to discuss. He wanted to discuss the matter objectively and FML in rather predictable fashion made the debate personal claiming that because Vivify was not an authority all he had to proffer was personal opinions anyway.
Don't know what that is about but if sincere; kudos to you.
If not sincere then you are the a-hole.
I hope the former.
'all you can do is answer questions about your personal beliefs as they pertain to biblical topics?' - FML
Vivify naturally got frustrated at what he perceived as attempts to train wreck his thread. Vivify later apologised although I am not entirely sure that his frustration was not justified. FML is rather annoying character at times.
Originally posted by robbie carrobiePeople can decide for themselves whether they agree with your characterization of my attempt to engage vivify and his OP: Thread 172278
Vivify started a thread asking for Biblical topics to discuss. He wanted to discuss the matter objectively and FML in rather predictable fashion made the debate personal claiming that because Vivify was not an authority all he had to proffer was personal opinions anyway.
Originally posted by FMFHow else are the meant to decide? 🙄
People can decide for themselves whether they agree with your characterization of my attempt to engage vivify and his OP: Thread 172278
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI don’t think you can claim to be a scholar, robbie, when you don't seem to know what "personal opinions" means and what the words "discuss objectively" mean when a poster offers to field questions from people whose opinions he disagrees with and to do so explicitly in defence of his (temporarily reconstructed) personal religious beliefs. 😉
They could do no worse than the word of a scholar and a gentleman 😵
Originally posted by FMFWhy should anyone bother reading that thread. We all know your methodology. I can't imagine why vivify feels the need to apologize.
People can decide for themselves whether they agree with your characterization of my attempt to engage vivify and his OP: Thread 172278
Your true character is showing even now as evidenced by your ignoring of the OP.
Originally posted by FMFSorry but I don't know what you are saying. Its the words, they appear to be from a higher intelligence. Like heralds from the future displaying a technology far in advancement of anything I have ever seen. How I could hope to communicate on the same level is forlorn and unlikely given that I am barely a sentient being falling in and out of rational thought in a state of listless semi-literacy. Sigh if only I had a penny for every churlish boor that condescended to tell me what I know and what I do not know! I might be able to purchase a good quality dictionary! and decipher such complex patterns. 😵
I don’t think you can claim to be a scholar, robbie, when you don't seem to know what "personal opinions" means and what the words "discuss objectively" mean when a poster offers to field questions from people whose opinions he disagrees with and to do so explicitly in defence of his (temporarily reconstructed) personal religious beliefs. 😉
Originally posted by josephwIndeed this is what I thought as well, the usual attempts to make objective debate personal with 'what is your denomination' and other personal considerations.
Why should anyone bother reading that thread. We all know your methodology. I can't imagine why vivify feels the need to apologize.
Your true character is showing even now as evidenced by your ignoring of the OP.