Followers of Witness Lee...

@pb1022 said
I embrace science.

But the theory of evolution is not science.

It doesn’t follow the Scientific Method because one species turning into another species was neither observed nor demonstrated by an experiment. And there have been attempts at the latter with bacteria and fruit flies, which have very short generational spans.

As far as I know, the only “evidence” for macr ...[text shortened]...
It’s clearly not science and those who don’t believe it are not against science. We’re for science.

Can anyone dispute a single thing I said in this post?

@pb1022 said
Can anyone dispute a single thing I said in this post?

So... you've got nothing?

@avalanchethecat said
So... you've got nothing?

I've arranged to book a lab next Tuesday afternoon where I will demonstrate one species evolving into another. If I fail to achieve this, before the sandwiches arrive, it will evidence that evolution doesn't happen.

@pb1022 said
Can anyone dispute a single thing I said in this post?

Aren't dogs just domesticated wolves?

Also, there is no mention of domestic housecats in the canonical Bible, so they must not have existed until sometime after the fall of the Roman Empire.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke

I've arranged to book a lab next Tuesday afternoon where I will demonstrate one species evolving into another. If I fail to achieve this, before the sandwiches arrive, it will evidence that evolution doesn't happen.

You mean if the sandwiches arrive 20 million years from now?

@sonship said
@Ghost-of-a-Duke

I've arranged to book a lab next Tuesday afternoon where I will demonstrate one species evolving into another. If I fail to achieve this, before the sandwiches arrive, it will evidence that evolution doesn't happen.

You mean if the sandwiches arrive 20 million years from now?

Way to miss the point/irony big guy.

Evolution 'can not' be demonstrated due to the time scale required. Well done.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
I've arranged to book a lab next Tuesday afternoon where I will demonstrate one species evolving into another. If I fail to achieve this, before the sandwiches arrive, it will evidence that evolution doesn't happen.

Are you suggesting the scientists who tried to demonstrate speciation with bacteria and fruit flies were fools?

And I don’t care *why* macroevolution hasn’t been observed or demonstrated by an experiment.

The fact remains it hasn’t and therefore does not follow the Scientific Method.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Way to miss the point/irony big guy.

Evolution 'can not' be demonstrated due to the time scale required. Well done.

Once again, are you suggesting scientists involved in experiments to demonstrate speciation were fools?

@pb1022 said
Once again, are you suggesting scientists involved in experiments to demonstrate speciation were fools?

Still waiting for your 'scientific' theory to explain the fossil record. On an unscientific one. Anything at all, basically.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke

Evolution 'can not' be demonstrated due to the time scale required. Well done.

So that is why some of us ask ourselves - "Wait. Is this science conclusively proven such that it is foolish to question it? Or is this something like a philosophy or religion coming across as SO OBVIOUS how could anyone DARE to doubt?"

It takes a person of faith to recognize another person of faith.
I admit I have faith.
My NT told me up front " These things are written so that you may believe. . . "
I admit I have a belief.

Don't come to me with something not proven in lab (and unable to do so for whatever reason) and not seen and not demonstrated and say "I have science. YOU . . . tsk, tsk, . ... only have a belief."

@avalanchethecat said
Still waiting for your 'scientific' theory to explain the fossil record. On an unscientific one. Anything at all, basically.

And I’m still waiting for you to provide evidence of macroevolution.

And I asked you first 😉

@sonship said
@Ghost-of-a-Duke

Evolution 'can not' be demonstrated due to the time scale required. Well done.

So that is why some of us ask ourselves - "Wait. Is this science conclusively proven such that it is foolish to question it? Or is this something like a philosophy or religion coming across as SO OBVIOUS how could anyone DARE to doubt?"

It ...[text shortened]... d not demonstrated and say " I have science. YOU . . . tsk, tsk, . ... only have a belief"

The theory of evolution is the religion of atheists. It’s how they justify their atheism.

More evidence exists for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ than exists for the complexity of life we see today being the result of blind chance (random mutations and natural selection.)

Not to mention evolutionists/atheists can’t even hypothesize how life began.

@pb1022 said
And I’m still waiting for you to provide evidence of macroevolution.

And I asked you first 😉

Evidence was provided, you didn't accept it. Do you have an alternative theory at all?

@avalanchethecat said
Evidence was provided, you didn't accept it. Do you have an alternative theory at all?

I don’t recall evidence being provided. What was it?

Saying “The fossil record” and “A lot of scientists believe it” isn’t evidence 😉

@pb1022 said
I don’t recall evidence being provided. What was it?

Saying “The fossil record” and “A lot of scientists believe it” isn’t evidence 😉

If you are able to dismiss the fossil record with a silly 'wink' emoji, there is nothing I can provide which will satisfy you.

It's looking like you have no alternative theory at all, which rather suggests that your only purpose in repeatedly asserting that the theory of evolution is 'unscientific' is trolling. No real surprise there.