Go back
Formerly useful

Formerly useful

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down


Originally posted by FreakyKBH
It's merely to avoid a wall of text.

You seem offended.[hidden]if you don't like them, don't read them[/hidden]
You seem offended {hidden}if you don't like them, don't read them

You hypocritical piece of s h 1t


Originally posted by FreakyKBH
.....that you meant it tongue in cheek.
Maybe not.
I was being serious. If you could preach to dolphins, and they could understand you, I have no doubt that some of them would be religious.

So you have some examples you care to cite which discuss the religiosity of any creature other than man?
I hardly think it requires examples, I think that if you have a pet, you would be able to identify some behaviours in it that are the same as some behaviours to be noted in religious people. Deference to authority for example.

I am claiming--- very seriously, very emphatically--- that there exists no record of animals behaving in any way, shape or form similar in action to the evident religious nature of man.
And I do not think you know very much about animals. I also think you are being quite ridiculous when you make a claim about all records. You are of course dismissing most fairy tales, and even a few religious books. For example, the snake in the garden of Eden seemed quite religious.