Forum etiquette

Originally posted by stellspalfie
i dont feel that divegeester has bullied anybody. i find it quite shocking how quick and easy you throw around such a serious word as 'bully'....but then i bow to your expertise, as you spend much of your life telling people they will be punished if they do not conform with your religious views, you are the nearest thing we have to a bully on this forum.

ohhhh but thats where you are wrong palfiedrool, i have an independent third party private message which also acknowledges what has transpired here, in fact all you need to do is provide evidence that your defendant also metes out the same treatment to non Jehovah's witnesses.

Originally posted by yoctobyte
Why not ignore those that are problematic to you. Sitting here on the side lines, I am on my 3rd bucket of popcorn and the show is getting pretty old.

I Don't know why it has to be this way, y'all are just feeding each other over something that really doesn't matter, IMO.

and the show is getting pretty old

indeed what you are witneesing is what divesgeester intended to do with his thread all along, attempt to use it to humiliate other people, its what he does. Let us reflect upon what we have learned from this thread.

Robbie carrobie is an ace guy. Properknob will defend anyone as long as its against robbie carrobie, same as Stelspalfie. FMF has returned from the dead and seems himself again and divesgeester is the loathsome lowdown snake belly and cowardly bully with ulterior motives that we have known for so long and Rajk is like a cackling crow.

-Removed-

He is under no duress to answer any of your questions, is he?

-Removed-

Strange i don't feel like a victim, have I taken a hit, where is it, cant see it.

-Removed-

No he is not, infact under the banner of forum etiquette if he feels that someone is badgering, forcing and bullying him or uncomfortable answering any questions he has every right to desist. Infact its enshrined into law in some countries, its termed 'taking the fifth' in America and is a safeguard against self incrimination. What in fact is a breach of forum etiquette is forcing someone to answer against their will, starting threads to humiliate them and using there distressing personal circumstances to propagandize, thats a breach of forum etiquette,

Who the hell do you think you are that you can demand a reason from someone? Do you think you are so big that everyone must answer to you? if they don't you will bully them into answering to you? Well Mr Big, suck this up, NO ONE IS UNDER DURESS TO SAY A SINGLE WORD TO YOU and that you disparagingly force contributors to do so using various guises is a real breach of forum etiquette.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
ohhhh but thats where you are wrong palfiedrool, i have an independent third party private message which also acknowledges what has transpired here, in fact all you need to do is provide evidence that your defendant also metes out the same treatment to non Jehovah's witnesses.

you only have a data pool of two j.w's you would need a much larger sample size before you can claim its purely down to your specific religion.
have you ever considered that you may have an anti-social personality.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
you only have a data pool of two j.w's you would need a much larger sample size before you can claim its purely down to your specific religion.
have you ever considered that you may have an anti-social personality.

No I've never considered it, are you going to give me a personal psychotherapy session to determine if its the case?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
No he is not, infact under the banner of forum etiquette if he feels that someone is badgering, forcing and bullying him or uncomfortable answering any questions he has every right to desist. Infact its enshrined into law in some countries, its termed 'taking the fifth' in America and is a safeguard against self incrimination. What in fact is a breac ...[text shortened]... paragingly force contributors to do so using various guises is a real breach of forum etiquette.

this isnt a court of law. its just a forum, a forum for debate. why would anybody take the '5th'?????? are you admitting that galveston purposely refused to answer questions on the grounds it might incriminate him???????????

get a sense of perspective!!!!!

-Removed-

So you hate Jehovahs Witnesses, so you like to humiliate other people, so you get off on it, so what?