Why does every boofhead in this forum bang the drum for free speech, even when that free speech incites bombing trains with children and pregnant women?
That so-called free speech must be stopped at all cost.
Only a crazy mad man would speak such a speech...........and the right thing to do is to stop him.
All those whining and crybaby progressive free preachers are complete boofheads and fools and do nothing to solve the problems but only add to them.
Free Speech is for.......only supporting truth and wisdom and love and understanding.
Originally posted by Dasa Why does every boofhead in this forum bang the drum for free speech, even when that free speech incites bombing trains with children and pregnant women?
That so-called free speech must be stopped at all cost.
Only a crazy mad man would speak such a speech...........and the right thing to do is to stop him.
All those whining and crybaby progressive free ...[text shortened]... ng truth and wisdom and love and understanding.
Originally posted by Dasa Why does every boofhead in this forum bang the drum for free speech, even when that free speech incites bombing trains with children and pregnant women.
Dasa, you are using the word "boofhead" incorrectly.
Originally posted by Dasa Free Speech is for.......only supporting truth and wisdom and love and understanding.
If people want to genuinely advocate for freedom of speech they must also be willing to advocate for the freedom of speech of those they disagree with.
Originally posted by FMF If people want to genuinely advocate for freedom of speech they must also be willing to advocate for the freedom of speech of those they disagree with.
Yes. However most countries/societies/people who recognise 'freedom of speech/expression' do so with limits.
And don't permit completely unrestricted freedom of speech.
I am for 'freedom of speech', but not unrestricted freedom of speech.
Yes. However most countries/societies/people who recognise 'freedom of speech/expression' do so with limits. And don't permit completely unrestricted freedom of speech.
I don't claim to be speaking on behalf of "most countries/societies/people".
I am not disputing the web site owner's right to delete anything he wants. I am simply resisting the inclinations of people like you and Suzianne to exert some degree of control over what ideas I am allowed to expose myself to. Why don't you just boycott Dasa's posts and refuse to read them?
I am for 'freedom of speech', but not unrestricted freedom of speech. Dasa crosses the line.
He certainly crosses the line of decency but this still doesn't mean I want you to get your wish and prevent me from reading what he has to say. 😉
Originally posted by Dasa Why does every boofhead in this forum bang the drum for free speech, even when that free speech incites bombing trains with children and pregnant women?
If you were to implement your wish of seeing Islam wiped off the face of the earth, would you spare those on trains with children and Muslim women who are pregnant?