Originally posted by AThousandYoung
There is no Law of Sympathy, contrary to what medieval magicians believed. There is no telepathy as far as I know. I don't think there's any vehicle for brain patterns to communicate without speech, or body language, or the like. That's why we have those things.
But it is possible, of course.
There is an interesting story about the dillution of homeopathy
that made me wonder if science can really answer all our questions.
'A team of French allergy researchers led by Jacques Benveniste, who has died aged 69, described how an allergy test worked even when the reagent - the substance to be used in the chemical reaction - was so diluted with water that the odds were against a single molecule remaining. Benveniste, a biologist and immunologist, argued that the water used for dilution "remembered" the molecule that had been diluted out of existence.
Nature had printed the article on condition that it could appoint three experts to observe the experiment being replicated. '
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2004/oct/21/obituaries.guardianobituaries
Anyway to cut a long story short, the team were investigated by
independent scientists who taped the results, wrapped in tinfoil to
the ceiling of the lab. The next day the results were analysed and
found to show a random correlation.
'Randi's defence of the investigation was to argue that if he, Randi, said he kept a goat in his garden, people might be mildly surprised but they would be unlikely to disbelieve him. If, however, he said that he kept a unicorn in his garden, they might want to check how firmly its horn was attached.'
I find Randi's defence to be very interesting. If we consider the wave
/slit experiment on the dual nature of electrons, we find that electrons
behave differently when they are observed, compared to when they
are not.
Could it be said that many other scientific results are also affected by
the act of measuring?