Originally posted by sonhouseI only expect those that might be interested enough to watch. I mainly referenced it to let everyone know that there has been a lot of archaeological evidence found to support claims of biblical historical accuracy.
You really expect anyone to watch an hour and a half video of opinions?
Originally posted by RJHindsA lot of refuted evidence, you mean. These dudes don't publish so you just get opinions and outright lies in their zeal to prove the world is only 6K years old.
I only expect those that might be interested enough to watch. I mainly referenced it to let everyone know that there has been a lot of archaeological evidence found to support claims of biblical historical accuracy.
Originally posted by darvlayTake heart from perhaps fulfilling a prophesy. Exploding heads may have been alluded to in amongst the Book of Revelation somewhere. 😉
Christians embracing archaeological evidence to support claims of biblical historical accuracy.
Irony... too..... much..... Brain... is.... exploding.......
1 edit
Originally posted by sonhouseThe Shroud of Turin and the Sudarium of Oviedo are the best historical evidence for the accuracy of the biblical crucifixion and resurrection of Christ Jesus.
Yeah, it should be 'hysterical accuracy of the bible'.
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/kathyschiffer/2013/02/the-sudarium-of-oviedo-the-other-shroud-of-jesus/
Originally posted by RJHindsYou know the Turin shroud is proven to have been manufactured in the middle-ages?
The Shroud of Turin and the Sudarium of Oviedo are the best historical evidence for the accuracy of the biblical crucifixion and resurrection of Christ Jesus.
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/kathyschiffer/2013/02/the-sudarium-of-oviedo-the-other-shroud-of-jesus/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXXUeLETRgM