Originally posted by David C
Originally posted by robbie carrobie
[b]snip for if there was true honesty, given the scandalously improbable chance of life having arisen from non living matter snip
I've never understood the theistic objection to "life arising from non-living matter". Isn't that precisely what Genesis 2:7 states? So, the authors of Genesis, ign theory" is unalterable, despite the input of any new data. Maybe I'm missing something.[/b]
==================================
I've never understood the theistic objection to "life arising from non-living matter". Isn't that precisely what Genesis 2:7 states? So, the authors of Genesis, ignorant of biology, and unable to form a theory based on anything other than oral folklore, come up with this idea. "It was Holy magic".
====================================
What Genesis explains is that all CREATED lives have their source of creation from a Life which is UNCREATED. The UNCREATED Life preceeded and is responsible for the existence of all CREATED lives.
The first verse in the Bible says
"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth" (Gen. 1:1)
The fact is put forth that preceeding the entire unverse is this UNCREATED and Divine Life - God. If it is not clear from Genesis that God is UNCREATED Life it surely becomes clear in passages like Psalm 90 where it says
" ... from eternity to eternity, You are God" (Psalm 90:2b)
Or we may realize God's eternal livingness from
Isaiah 57:15 - "For thus says the high and exalted One, Who inhabits eternity, whose name is Holy ...."
The UNCREATED and eternal Life is the source of all other lives in existence. That is what the Bible teaches and reveals. This fact can be appreciated even if mankind should multiply his scientific knowledge in the future 10 fold.
I don't think that because it was uttered in a pre-biological science era that that makes it less true. Some truth just is not effected by the encrease of scientific knowledge.
========================
In what way is the Genesis explanation different than current scientific hypotheses on abiogenesis? Other than the fact that the Genesis "theory" is unalterable, despite the input of any new data. Maybe I'm missing something.
=====================================
In abiogenesis life is preceeded by that which is non-living. In Genesis life is preceeded by a living Divine and Uncreated Life.
I think we would have to call the creation of biological life a miracle.
I think the foundations of life on this planet are founded in the miraculous done by the same God who
"in the beginning ... created" everything.
We are not forbidden to explore on and on and try to figure out how life arose. But I think God has informed us and in such a way that it resonates to people of various cultures in various eras of human history.