18 May 14
Originally posted by redbaronsReality is more fascinating than fiction. You should take one morning, and first thing read aloud the first two chapters of the book of Ephesians.
kevin Bacon played the evil one trying to start a NW bay of pigs etc anyway no one mentioned God at any time or creationism I mean they are mutations natural selection etc but a piss poor film.
What is really going on this universe is much more intriguing than any science fiction. Once you touch the real truth of what is going on no fiction will surpass the excitement you'll know.
Originally posted by sonshipcome on lighten up bro al this spiritual claptrap needs a shot in the arm.
Reality is more fascinating than fiction. You should take one morning, and first thing read aloud the first two chapters of the book of Ephesians.
What is really going on this universe is much more intriguing than any science fiction. Once you touch the real truth of what is going on no fiction will surpass the excitement you'll know.
Originally posted by redbaronsSo, let me get this straight.
kevin Bacon played the evil one trying to start a NW bay of pigs etc anyway no one mentioned God at any time or creationism I mean they are mutations natural selection etc but a piss poor film.
Are you saying that because God and/or creationism was not mentioned, that's why it was a "piss poor" film?
18 May 14
Originally posted by redbaronsThe only good X-Men film have been the two Prequels about wolverine
kevin Bacon played the evil one trying to start a NW bay of pigs etc anyway no one mentioned God at any time or creationism I mean they are mutations natural selection etc but a piss poor film.
Originally posted by redbaronsyou are not making any sense. it was a poor film because of mutations and/or natural selection? despite of it? nobody mentioned god, good thing or bad thing?
kevin Bacon played the evil one trying to start a NW bay of pigs etc anyway no one mentioned God at any time or creationism I mean they are mutations natural selection etc but a piss poor film.
i can't make heads or tails of your post. what are we supposed to debate here?
19 May 14
Originally posted by Zahlanzimaking my point if you don't get it more fool you.
you are not making any sense. it was a poor film because of mutations and/or natural selection? despite of it? nobody mentioned god, good thing or bad thing?
i can't make heads or tails of your post. what are we supposed to debate here?