01 Jul '08 09:35>
Originally posted by Zahlanzi…e=mc^2 is the mass energy equivalent. nuclear power stations use fission, no connection there, look it up….
e=mc^2 is the mass energy equivalent. nuclear power stations use fission, no connection there, look it up. if e=mc^2 would be wrong it won't change the fact that an atomic bomb goes "boom" . so it would still work but we wouldn't know the exact amount of energy released.
it is not absurd to suggest that todays science may be wrong. and i didn't suggest ...[text shortened]... n some circumstances. so it is not absurd to think quantum physics might be proven wrong.
Sorry! You are talking crap! I have studied nuclear physics at university (have you?) and I understand it perfectly (do you?) . Nuclear fission is the splitting of the nucleus of an atom into parts (lighter nuclei ) which can release large amounts of energy and how much energy it releases is determined by E=mc^2
You obviously don’t understand basic nuclear physics.
…if e=mc^2 would be wrong it won't change the fact that an atomic bomb goes "boom"…
Wrong! Again you display your compete ignorance of nuclear physics. If e=mc^2 is wrong then there would be no accounting for the vast amounts of energy an atom bomb releases.
…it is not absurd to suggest that todays science may be wrong. and i didn't suggest the whole of science.
So what? A small part of science “may” be wrong (and probably is somewhere) but it would still be absurd to suggest most of science “may” be wrong (if you would suggest such a thing) because if most of it was wrong, then modern technology wouldn’t work.
…the science of Ptolemy has been proven partially wrong. so was Newton physics proven wrong in some circumstances. so it is not absurd to think quantum physics might be proven wrong….
If quantum physics was eventually proven wrong in some circumstances then that is just the nature of science for science evolves and improves that way. But it would be absurd to suggest that quantum physics is wrong in most circumstances (if you would suggest such a thing) because, if that was true, then modern technology wouldn’t work. Therefore, in that narrow sense, quantum physics must be mostly right just as Newton physics must be mostly right even though relativity proofs Newton physics to make inaccurate predictions under certain extreme conditions (such as what will happen if you went you travel close to the speed of light etc)