- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
09 Jul 06
Originally posted by FreakyKBHThere is no evidence to support any of these claims you are stating as fact. And you are carefully avoiding responding to my posts so I will ask you a simple question.
Every member of the human race is involved with the first imputation, as it begins at the moment of physical birth. Soul life is imputed by God to the biological life of the fetus, thus creating human life. As shown in an earlier thread related to where life comes from (see, "Who Give(s) Life?" from earlier this spring), there is a distinction between bi ...[text shortened]... 's purpose in imputing the soul has always been the same: for our happiness and blessing.
What is the point in discussing the properties of something, when there is no evidence to support its existance and there is considerable evidence in favour of it not existing, and even if it did exist, would nesecerily be so far out of the realms of human understanding as to be incomprehensible to us?
09 Jul 06
Sorry, guv'nah. I should have started with the usual disclaimer. As has been established, my rants are informed by a belief that the Bible is the inerrant word of God. As such, the Bible takes precedence over all other sources as the final authority on any subject in which it concerns itself.
Does that make my position more perspicuous?
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
27 Jul 06
Originally posted by FreakyKBHDeveloping some wisdom. Evolution would require there to be selection pressure on subsequent generations. Otherwise lemmings would evolve wings on the way down. You will never agree with evolution while you misunderstand it 😉 .
True that. Maybe I'm evolving some wisdom.