13 Aug 15
The question ...........Is there intelligent design in the cosmos is absurd.
You cannot observe anything that has not have its foundation rooted in intelligence.
From the ecosystems of our planet down to the tiny ant there is evidence of intelligence.
Intelligence is in all places at all times.
You cannot find a thing that does not display intelligence at its foundation.
The question ( Is there intelligent design?) is like asking........ Is the Pope Catholic.
So to all those atheistic sciency people out there who argue against intelligent design...............( you are simply displaying your dishonesty of pretending you do not observe this intelligence.)
ITS EVERYWHERE............
13 Aug 15
Originally posted by DasaSo posting evidence should be child's play.
The question ...........Is there intelligent design in the cosmos is absurd.
You cannot observe anything that has not have its foundation rooted in intelligence.
From the ecosystems of our planet down to the tiny ant there is evidence of intelligence.
Intelligence is in all places at all times.
You cannot find a thing that does not display intellige ...[text shortened]... ur dishonesty of pretending you do not observe this intelligence.)
ITS EVERYWHERE............
16 Aug 15
Originally posted by RJHindsMore creationist bullshyte. Their MO: come into a subject with a preprogrammed verdict of what the outcome should be. Then bend science to their ends no matter what the truth of the subject is. If the evidence points away from a young Earth, that evidence is false, no matter HOW much science is behind it.
https://answersingenesis.org/evidence-for-creation/design-in-nature/
The Human Nervous System: Evidence of Intelligent Design
http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=12&article=1581
Real unbiased bullshtye, eh.
17 Aug 15
Originally posted by sonhouseAs KellyJay has mentioned before, everyone comes into science with a bias and attempts to prove it. The only difference between the atheist evilutionists and the creationists is that the creationists do not make fraudulent evidence like the atheist evilutionists do.
More creationist bullshyte. Their MO: come into a subject with a preprogrammed verdict of what the outcome should be. Then bend science to their ends no matter what the truth of the subject is. If the evidence points away from a young Earth, that evidence is false, no matter HOW much science is behind it.
Real unbiased bullshtye, eh.
17 Aug 15
Originally posted by DasaWilliam Paley. Natural Theology; or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity published in 1809, was the classic account of intelligent design in the modern era and Charles Darwin loved this book, occupied the same university room that Paley had done before him, and spent his career looking for evidence to support the theory. You can say what you like about Darwin, and people do, but to suggest he ignored (or was ignorant of) the intelligent design theory would be pig ignorance and factually wrong. Darwin loved Paly and the reason he took decades of research before publishing his refutation of ID was that he wanted the evidence to support ID. In the end he recognised this was impossible and there is no intelligent, educated adult today with any right to argue that he reached this conclusion without considering the alternatives.
When you have your eyes shut tight and say.............I cannot observe intelligent design.
THATS................ DISHONEST.
17 Aug 15
Originally posted by finneganCharles Darwin did not take enough time to be sure his theory was correct. The pillars of evolution are falling over like a house made of cards.
William Paley. Natural Theology; or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity published in 1809, was the classic account of intelligent design in the modern era and Charles Darwin loved this book, occupied the same university room that Paley had done before him, and spent his career looking for evidence to support the theory. You can say what ...[text shortened]... ay with any right to argue that he reached this conclusion without considering the alternatives.
Bringing Down The Pillars of Evolution