17 Apr '09 21:51>
Originally posted by ScriabinAgain: Rude, rude...
...but he's got more lutefisk than sense between his ears.
Originally posted by Palynkahelloooooo ???
Haha! Accusations of plagiarism in a Nasreddin story. đ”
Originally posted by twhiteheadthat is non-responsive. the witness is directed to answer the question or withdraw his objection. Otherwise the objection shall be over ruled as without foundation or proper support.
It simply doesn't. The story does not in any way show that morals are ultimately selfish.
Originally posted by Bosse de Nageok, I contend that the point of morality is not altruism, but rather to serve one's own interests by using non-violent, non-coercive means to find a consensus position that all parties can accept.
That's his interpretation of the story, which he ought to explain.
What's yours?
Originally posted by ScriabinIt's not smart to be rude. Never smart. Always foolish. You show your real face while you're rude. Sorry to have to say it, but you would be more pleasant if you were nice.
I do not suffer fools gladly
stop being foolish and I'll stop being sharp with you
Originally posted by FabianFnasand the sky would be more blue if it were more blue.
It's not smart to be rude. Never smart. Always foolish. You show your real face while you're rude. Sorry to have to say it, but you would be more pleasant if you were nice.
Originally posted by ScriabinOh, lord... Again more rudeness from you.
and the sky would be more blue if it were more blue.
are you trying particularly hard today to be dim?
Originally posted by FabianFnashaven't I been clear enough? I don't particularly value what you think so long as it is such a low quality product.
Oh, lord... Again more rudeness from you.
Do you really think that you are on-topic with your postings about me? You chosed the title "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how you place the blame". I think you lose...
Originally posted by ScriabinWhy do you then persist to answer my postings? Just to dig further and further off-topic?
haven't I been clear enough? I don't particularly value what you think so long as it is such a low quality product.
Originally posted by FabianFnaswhat debate?
Why do you then persist to answer my postings? Just to dig further and further off-topic?
Whenever someone goes off-topic by being attacking, then he has already lost the debate. This was no debate from the beginning, just plain rudeness. It's not civilized.
You have lost the 'debate'. I don't have time for you anymore. Good bye.
Originally posted by Bosse de Nagethank you.
Your first response to this thread is an accusation of plagiarism. your next an outright dismissal of it, and you talk about being rude?
As a matter of fact, though, Scriabin is rude -- and you are a dolt: you're both right.