Ivory Tower Arcana Resurrected!

Originally posted by lucifershammer
Why? It's not as though the surfaces have been superglued together.

Take it to a new thread on Viscosity. You're off topic.

Originally posted by Nordlys
Maybe you could say some words about the topological significance of the Crucifixion.

As far as I know, no lances were put anywhere that affected the Holy Topology.

Originally posted by royalchicken
As far as I know, no lances were put anywhere that affected the Holy Topology.

But a post-Crucifixion (with nails removed) entity wouldn't be able to be transformed into a sphere.

The godless would be godly! Praise the Lord!

Originally posted by Palynka
But a post-Crucifixion (with nails removed) entity wouldn't be able to be transformed into a sphere.

The godless would be godly! Praise the Lord!

This is a good observation. Jesus a Sodomite! Praise Jesus!

Originally posted by Palynka
But a post-Crucifixion (with nails removed) entity wouldn't be able to be transformed into a sphere.

Yes, that's what I was talking about. A post-Crucifixion entity is quite holy.

Originally posted by royalchicken
[b]A Topological Look at Leviticus

R. Chicken, Really Adjunct Professa' of Arcana, Tha Ivory Tower

Only read this if your balls are open and you're not discrete.

The human body, from a topological point of view, is a surface, compact (because all of its boundaries are part of it and it is bounded in size) and connected (because, roug ...[text shortened]... umber of human surfaces possible in harmonious-union-preserving topological orgies?[/b]

Does the presence of a urethra in the female vagina, connected internally, albeit convolutedly, to both mouth and anus, complicate your topological thesis?

Originally posted by royalchicken
[b]A Topological Look at Leviticus

R. Chicken, Really Adjunct Professa' of Arcana, Tha Ivory Tower

Only read this if your balls are open and you're not discrete.

The human body, from a topological point of view, is a surface, compact (because all of its boundaries are part of it and it is bounded in size) and connected (because, roug ...[text shortened]... umber of human surfaces possible in harmonious-union-preserving topological orgies?[/b]

Does this imply that a hand-job is topologically tolerable?

Originally posted by Pawnokeyhole
Does this imply that a hand-job is topologically tolerable?

A handjob creates a hole in the giver, unless things are too large to close the fingers around, and immediately negates it, so it's homeomorphic to The Way God Intended, being as it is but one way of taking a connected sum of two human surfaces.

Originally posted by royalchicken
It sounds so dodgy when put that way. People must be scared to be Hausdorff somewhere private with you.

People are like doughnuts; they have holes or jam in them.

Originally posted by royalchicken
A handjob creates a hole in the giver, unless things are too large to close the fingers around, and immediately negates it, so it's homeomorphic to The Way God Intended, being as it is but one way of taking a connected sum of two human surfaces.

I think nasal inhalation renders buccal coition topologically tolerable, in that the receving party is afforded the dignity of not being made a dent.

Originally posted by Pawnokeyhole
I think nasal inhalation renders buccal coition topologically tolerable, in that the receving party is afforded the dignity of not being made a dent.

Good point. Blow jobs are topologically godly if there is no deep throating.

Originally posted by Palynka
Good point. Blow jobs are topologically godly if there is no deep throating.

If both ends of the alimentary canal were bilaterly stuffed, I believe that royalchicken's stern topological stipulations might also be satisfied.

Not to mention, the person being bilaterly stuffed.