1. Joined
    31 May '06
    Moves
    1795
    08 May '14 15:41
    Originally posted by Suzianne
    No, wrong. I asked Wolfgang. Not other atheists, not you. There's a distinct difference between you and Wolfgang. As you said, he wants to know what I think. You don't give a rat's ass.

    BTW, reality is in the eye of the beholder. YOUR reality says faith is useless. MY reality says faith is important. Pardon me if I don't subscribe to your "reality ...[text shortened]...
    "Reality doesn't care if you believe it or not." First thing you've said right in a long time.
    Wrong on all counts. Sadly, you used to be more reasonable.

    If I didn't care what you thought I wouldn't be here. And I wouldn't ask you
    questions.

    Second, Reality is not in the eye of the beholder, Reality is that which doesn't
    care if you believe it or not. The two concepts are mutually exclusive.

    And faith is a bad way of forming beliefs in ANY universe/reality.

    I have provided [as have others] excellent reasons why this is, you have never
    presented any reasons why faith is a good method for forming beliefs.
    All you have ever said is that the being you believe based on faith tells you that
    you should believe in it based on faith... Which is a nice self reinforcing delusion.

    You accuse me of ignorance of what... exactly? What is it you think I am ignorant of,
    ie don't know about, that would change whether or not I believe in a god?


    You run away in fear any time someone deploys a rational argument or hints at the use
    of logic. Claiming that you don't or can't understand these things...


    It's not looking like me who is the ignorant one, or the one trying to maintain ignorance.
  2. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    09 May '14 03:26
    Originally posted by wolfgang59
    I'm not claiming to be expert - .......

    My understanding is that JC had to be born free of "original sin"
    and therefore his conception could not be a sin.

    Catholics go a step further by demanding Mary be free of "original sin"
    too so came up with the "Immaculate Conception".

    Suzianne's position (I think) is that Jesus could not have been marr ...[text shortened]... nception so I see no reason
    why they have a need for Jesus to be single.

    How do you see it?
    The Holy Spirit overshadowed Mary to cover the original sin nature of Mary, so that Jesus could be conceived without sin. However, that does not prevent Mary from having the original sin nature.

    God married Adam and Eve before they had sinned, so marriage by itself is not sinful. Therefore, suzianne must be objecting to the marriage by Jesus to a sinful woman.
  3. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    09 May '14 11:38
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    The Holy Spirit overshadowed Mary to cover the original sin nature of Mary, so that Jesus could be conceived without sin. However, that does not prevent Mary from having the original sin nature.

    God married Adam and Eve before they had sinned, so marriage by itself is not sinful. Therefore, suzianne must be objecting to the marriage by Jesus to a sinful woman.
    Rock solid logic as usual RJ.





    🙄
  4. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Feb '14
    Moves
    1339
    09 May '14 11:411 edit
    Originally posted by wolfgang59
    Rock solid logic as usual RJ.





    🙄
    rj is such a wag he should be doing stand up.
  5. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    09 May '14 14:34
    Originally posted by redbarons
    rj is such a wag he should be doing stand up.
    He's not funny enough. RBHILL, however, would KILL at stand up.
  6. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Feb '14
    Moves
    1339
    09 May '14 15:27
    Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
    He's not funny enough. RBHILL, however, would KILL at stand up.
    a comedy duo Hinds & Hill so funny they will Kill.
  7. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    09 May '14 22:01
    Originally posted by redbarons
    a comedy duo Hinds & Hill so funny they will Kill.
    Yeah, that would work. RJ as the straight man.
  8. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Feb '14
    Moves
    1339
    10 May '14 09:571 edit
    Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
    Yeah, that would work. RJ as the straight man.
    are you suggesting that mr hill is not straight but possibly gay?
  9. SubscriberSuzianne
    Misfit Queen
    Isle of Misfit Toys
    Joined
    08 Aug '03
    Moves
    36625
    11 May '14 09:01
    Originally posted by googlefudge
    Wrong on all counts. Sadly, you used to be more reasonable.

    If I didn't care what you thought I wouldn't be here. And I wouldn't ask you
    questions.

    Second, Reality is not in the eye of the beholder, Reality is that which doesn't
    care if you believe it or not. The two concepts are mutually exclusive.

    And faith is a bad way of forming beliefs ...[text shortened]...


    It's not looking like me who is the ignorant one, or the one trying to maintain ignorance.
    I used to be more reasonable?

    Well, you used to be more respectful, or at least better at giving the impression of such.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree