4 edits
Originally posted by AThousandYoungSocrates' commitment to the community seemed to be absolute. My impression of reading how he submitted to his execution was that it was that he argued that it was reasonable thing to do. This was to the dispair of his friends who plotted and pleaded for him not to die. Am I recalling it right ?
I seem to see a lot of parallels between Socrates as portrayed by Plato at his trial and Buddhist ideas.
Both embrace the abandonment of physical and impulsive pleasures and egocentrism in favor of quietness of mind and cheerful acceptance of reality.
Any thoughts?
His method, according to Plato, was to continue to ask his would be pursuaders question after question to show them that killing himself was the appropriate thing to do, for society had rejected his wisdom.
Am I right ? As a servant of society, then, he ought to drink the poison and die. I recall one of the debaters running out of the room in tears because they could not pursuade Sacrates to escape.
That is pretty much what I mostly remember about reading of Socrates' trial.
How does it relate to Buddhist ideas ? I don't know yet, or if it does.
1 edit
Originally posted by TaomanAll things that are presented, comprise a perfect expression of what is.
Acceptance is still part of a duality. The "Tathagarta" went beyond acceptance and rejection. The anatman idea is not about acceptance and rejection of a self. It is beyond such.
Koan:
When Banzan was walking through a market he overheard a conversation between a butcher and his customer.
"Give me the best piece of meat you have," said the customer. re any piece of meat that is not the best."
At these words Banzan became enlightened.
At least, this was my attitude when I worked in my dad's meat market. 🙂
Originally posted by TaomanHow is this Butcher not practising unconditional acceptance?
Acceptance is still part of a duality. The "Tathagarta" went beyond acceptance and rejection. The anatman idea is not about acceptance and rejection of a self. It is beyond such.
Koan:
When Banzan was walking through a market he overheard a conversation between a butcher and his customer.
"Give me the best piece of meat you have," said the customer. ...[text shortened]... re any piece of meat that is not the best."
At these words Banzan became enlightened.
1 edit
Originally posted by JS357Now without a bone to pick,
All things that are presented, comprise a perfect expression of what is.
At least, this was my attitude when I worked in my dad's meat market. 🙂
my teeth clatter to the floor.
Where can I find the best chop in town?
I thought Plato's - but then Gautama's looked pretty good.
Bah! I don't trust either of 'em. Just don't ask me why.
Sumthin's missing.
ó
Originally posted by LordOfTheChessboardSounds a bit like asking someone to tell you they love you, doesn't it?
How is this Butcher not practising unconditional acceptance?
The request undermines itself.
Likewise, to me, is "practising" unconditional acceptance. Strange as it sounds, practiisng such, is more relaxing, not to trying to practice. This I must do...this I must not do...is still a form of "for and against", a form of desiring and rejection (conditions) within ourselves, and principally and initially towards ourselves and our own lacking human behaviors. Letting this inner "for and againsting" go entirely is itself unconditional acceptance.