1. Standard memberDasa
    Dasa
    Account suspended
    Joined
    20 May '10
    Moves
    8042
    07 Oct '11 17:36
    The Vedas have been infiltrated by a poisonous snake.

    That snake is the snake of impersonalism.

    Impersonalism is that belief that Gods supreme position is not personal - but all pervading Brahman the energy of God.

    Impersonalism can be very attractive because it tells you that after death that your soul merges into God - and you then become one with God.

    You then become God.

    This is false.

    There is another in this forum who is presenting this impersonalism.

    Be cautious of this poisonous snake teaching.
  2. Standard memberAgerg
    The 'edit'or
    converging to it
    Joined
    21 Aug '06
    Moves
    11458
    07 Oct '11 17:481 edit
    Originally posted by Dasa
    The Vedas have been infiltrated by a poisonous snake.

    That snake is the snake of impersonalism.

    Impersonalism is that belief that Gods supreme position is not personal - but all pervading Brahman the energy of God.

    Impersonalism can be very attractive because it tells you that after death that your soul merges into God - and you then become one with Go ...[text shortened]... his forum who is presenting this impersonalism.

    Be cautious of this poisonous snake teaching.
    More talking snakes! You fundamentalist nuts sure like your talking snakes don't you!? 😲
  3. Joined
    29 Dec '08
    Moves
    6788
    07 Oct '11 17:50
    Originally posted by Dasa
    The Vedas have been infiltrated by a poisonous snake.

    That snake is the snake of impersonalism.

    Impersonalism is that belief that Gods supreme position is not personal - but all pervading Brahman the energy of God.

    Impersonalism can be very attractive because it tells you that after death that your soul merges into God - and you then become one with Go ...[text shortened]... his forum who is presenting this impersonalism.

    Be cautious of this poisonous snake teaching.
    The idea that you "become" one with God relies on an illusion that you are not one with God in all moments.
  4. Joined
    16 Feb '08
    Moves
    86387
    08 Oct '11 07:30
    Originally posted by Dasa
    The Vedas have been infiltrated by a poisonous snake.

    That snake is the snake of impersonalism.

    Impersonalism is that belief that Gods supreme position is not personal - but all pervading Brahman the energy of God.

    Impersonalism can be very attractive because it tells you that after death that your soul merges into God - and you then become one with Go ...[text shortened]... his forum who is presenting this impersonalism.

    Be cautious of this poisonous snake teaching.
    Sounds really dangerous; any chance you can tell us who this is?
  5. Standard memberrvsakhadeo
    rvsakhadeo
    India
    Joined
    19 Feb '09
    Moves
    36544
    08 Oct '11 07:47
    Originally posted by divegeester
    Sounds really dangerous; any chance you can tell us who this is?
    Dasa is referring to me. I still do not know what is poisonous about a straightforward translation of an Upanishad. But Dasa's warning seems to have a restrospective effect as there are no comments on my thread on Taittiriya Upanishad.
  6. Joined
    16 Feb '08
    Moves
    86387
    08 Oct '11 08:10
    Originally posted by rvsakhadeo
    Dasa is referring to me. I still do not know what is poisonous about a straightforward translation of an Upanishad. But Dasa's warning seems to have a restrospective effect as there are no comments on my thread on Taittiriya Upanishad.
    Goodness me, you didn't have the temerity to disagree with him did you?
  7. Standard memberrvsakhadeo
    rvsakhadeo
    India
    Joined
    19 Feb '09
    Moves
    36544
    08 Oct '11 09:03
    Originally posted by divegeester
    Goodness me, you didn't have the temerity to disagree with him did you?
    I did berate him about his posts on Vedas and Vedant in my thread titled ' A request to Dasa and his several detractors '. Since then he believes that I am a poisonous snake .
  8. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12695
    08 Oct '11 11:34
    Originally posted by Dasa
    The Vedas have been infiltrated by a poisonous snake.

    That snake is the snake of impersonalism.

    Impersonalism is that belief that Gods supreme position is not personal - but all pervading Brahman the energy of God.

    Impersonalism can be very attractive because it tells you that after death that your soul merges into God - and you then become one with Go ...[text shortened]... his forum who is presenting this impersonalism.

    Be cautious of this poisonous snake teaching.
    Don't worry I would not believe that for my Holy Bible provides enough
    teachings to guard against that.
  9. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12695
    08 Oct '11 11:351 edit
    Originally posted by Agerg
    More talking snakes! You fundamentalist nuts sure like your talking snakes don't you!? 😲
    The talking snake is Satan is disquise, you nitwit.
  10. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12695
    08 Oct '11 11:37
    Originally posted by rvsakhadeo
    Dasa is referring to me. I still do not know what is poisonous about a straightforward translation of an Upanishad. But Dasa's warning seems to have a restrospective effect as there are no comments on my thread on Taittiriya Upanishad.
    It is a false teaching.
  11. Standard memberAgerg
    The 'edit'or
    converging to it
    Joined
    21 Aug '06
    Moves
    11458
    08 Oct '11 11:393 edits
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    The taking snake is Satan is disquise, you nitwit.
    You do realise, to be taken seriously, you need to have at least a shred of intellectual credibility before you can call people nitwits don't you!?

    No!???

    Oh okay...as you were!
  12. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12695
    08 Oct '11 11:45
    Originally posted by Agerg
    You do realise you need to have at least a shred of intellectual credibility before you can call people nitwits and have others take you seriously don't you!?

    No!???

    Oh okay...as you were!
    I don't have to have any credibility to tell the truth.
  13. Standard memberAgerg
    The 'edit'or
    converging to it
    Joined
    21 Aug '06
    Moves
    11458
    08 Oct '11 11:55
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    I don't have to have any credibility to tell the truth.
    The problem is that your perception of the truth is all muddled up. You have my sympathy 🙂
  14. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12695
    08 Oct '11 12:13
    Originally posted by Agerg
    The problem is that your perception of the truth is all muddled up. You have my sympathy 🙂
    Why don't you blasphame the Holy Spirit some more? You have already
    lost your soul, so why not make it clear to everyone. I'll be willing
    to testify against you at the judgement. Just put it on paper. It is
    a legal matter, you know.
  15. Standard memberAgerg
    The 'edit'or
    converging to it
    Joined
    21 Aug '06
    Moves
    11458
    08 Oct '11 12:222 edits
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Why don't you blasphame the Holy Spirit some more? You have already
    lost your soul, so why not make it clear to everyone. I'll be willing
    to testify against you at the judgement. Just put it on paper. It is
    a legal matter, you know.
    Well seeing as it's you...I Agerg do solemnly swear that I deny the holy spirit

    How does that grab ya? 🙂

    Now perhaps you will be so courteous to stand on one leg, pat your head whilst rubbing your belly and singing 10 green bottles so to permanently offend the mighty Hashkjab (and reaffirm your loyalty to erm...Yashua!?)
Back to Top