Go back
Poisonous snake.

Poisonous snake.

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

The Vedas have been infiltrated by a poisonous snake.

That snake is the snake of impersonalism.

Impersonalism is that belief that Gods supreme position is not personal - but all pervading Brahman the energy of God.

Impersonalism can be very attractive because it tells you that after death that your soul merges into God - and you then become one with God.

You then become God.

This is false.

There is another in this forum who is presenting this impersonalism.

Be cautious of this poisonous snake teaching.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by Dasa
The Vedas have been infiltrated by a poisonous snake.

That snake is the snake of impersonalism.

Impersonalism is that belief that Gods supreme position is not personal - but all pervading Brahman the energy of God.

Impersonalism can be very attractive because it tells you that after death that your soul merges into God - and you then become one with Go ...[text shortened]... his forum who is presenting this impersonalism.

Be cautious of this poisonous snake teaching.
More talking snakes! You fundamentalist nuts sure like your talking snakes don't you!? 😲

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dasa
The Vedas have been infiltrated by a poisonous snake.

That snake is the snake of impersonalism.

Impersonalism is that belief that Gods supreme position is not personal - but all pervading Brahman the energy of God.

Impersonalism can be very attractive because it tells you that after death that your soul merges into God - and you then become one with Go ...[text shortened]... his forum who is presenting this impersonalism.

Be cautious of this poisonous snake teaching.
The idea that you "become" one with God relies on an illusion that you are not one with God in all moments.

Vote Up
Vote Down
Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Dasa is referring to me. I still do not know what is poisonous about a straightforward translation of an Upanishad. But Dasa's warning seems to have a restrospective effect as there are no comments on my thread on Taittiriya Upanishad.

Vote Up
Vote Down
Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
I did berate him about his posts on Vedas and Vedant in my thread titled ' A request to Dasa and his several detractors '. Since then he believes that I am a poisonous snake .

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dasa
The Vedas have been infiltrated by a poisonous snake.

That snake is the snake of impersonalism.

Impersonalism is that belief that Gods supreme position is not personal - but all pervading Brahman the energy of God.

Impersonalism can be very attractive because it tells you that after death that your soul merges into God - and you then become one with Go ...[text shortened]... his forum who is presenting this impersonalism.

Be cautious of this poisonous snake teaching.
Don't worry I would not believe that for my Holy Bible provides enough
teachings to guard against that.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Agerg
More talking snakes! You fundamentalist nuts sure like your talking snakes don't you!? 😲
The talking snake is Satan is disquise, you nitwit.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rvsakhadeo
Dasa is referring to me. I still do not know what is poisonous about a straightforward translation of an Upanishad. But Dasa's warning seems to have a restrospective effect as there are no comments on my thread on Taittiriya Upanishad.
It is a false teaching.

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
The taking snake is Satan is disquise, you nitwit.
You do realise, to be taken seriously, you need to have at least a shred of intellectual credibility before you can call people nitwits don't you!?

No!???

Oh okay...as you were!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Agerg
You do realise you need to have at least a shred of intellectual credibility before you can call people nitwits and have others take you seriously don't you!?

No!???

Oh okay...as you were!
I don't have to have any credibility to tell the truth.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
I don't have to have any credibility to tell the truth.
The problem is that your perception of the truth is all muddled up. You have my sympathy 🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Agerg
The problem is that your perception of the truth is all muddled up. You have my sympathy 🙂
Why don't you blasphame the Holy Spirit some more? You have already
lost your soul, so why not make it clear to everyone. I'll be willing
to testify against you at the judgement. Just put it on paper. It is
a legal matter, you know.

2 edits
Vote Up
1
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Why don't you blasphame the Holy Spirit some more? You have already
lost your soul, so why not make it clear to everyone. I'll be willing
to testify against you at the judgement. Just put it on paper. It is
a legal matter, you know.
Well seeing as it's you...I Agerg do solemnly swear that I deny the holy spirit

How does that grab ya? 🙂

Now perhaps you will be so courteous to stand on one leg, pat your head whilst rubbing your belly and singing 10 green bottles so to permanently offend the mighty Hashkjab (and reaffirm your loyalty to erm...Yashua!?)