07 May 15
Originally posted by RJHindsOf course, you, with your Phd in astronomy, have published your findings against this discovery. When will it be published? Do you have any knowledge of spectroscopy? Do you doubt, for instance, that certain molecules and atoms produce measurable effects on light? That can be reproduced in any lab? Without knowledge of spectroscopy, how do you get off just saying it is speculation? What they are saying is certain kinds of molecules have been seen around stars and they hadn't thought of looking at the signs of those molecules around stars before, having conducted their searches in the molecular clouds in between the stars.
Nothing but speculation that amounts to nothing. 😏
Do you now say molecular clouds between stars are also only speculation?
07 May 15
2 edits
Originally posted by sonhouseAll I can say if they claim to see molecules in or near stars, then they must be gigantic molecules to be able to see them that far away. Maybe they can get some fools to believe that, but not ..... 😏
Of course, you, with your Phd in astronomy, have published your findings against this discovery. When will it be published? Do you have any knowledge of spectroscopy? Do you doubt, for instance, that certain molecules and atoms produce measurable effects on light? That can be reproduced in any lab? Without knowledge of spectroscopy, how do you get off just ...[text shortened]... between the stars.
Do you now say molecular clouds between stars are also only speculation?
The Near Genius
07 May 15
Originally posted by RJHindsDo you actually know what a molecular cloud is? Do you seriously think they are saying they are seeing individual molecules? If so, you are denser than even I imagined. Google the word 'aggregate'.
All I can say if they claim to see molecules in or near stars, then they must be gigantic molecules to be able to see them that far away. Maybe they can get some fools to believe that, but not ..... 😏
The Near Genius
07 May 15
Originally posted by sonhouseA molecular cloud is a name given to something astronomers imagine to exist in outer space. They are not real molecules like the DNA molecules. I have no need to google the word 'aggregate' for I am .....
Do you actually know what a molecular cloud is? Do you seriously think they are saying they are seeing individual molecules? If so, you are denser than even I imagined. Google the word 'aggregate'.
The Near Genius. 😏
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29597
07 May 15
Originally posted by RJHindsYou should though google the word 'genius' as i strongly suspect you have misunderstood its meaning.
A molecular cloud is a name given to something astronomers imagine to exist in outer space. They are not real molecules like the DNA molecules. I have no need to google the word 'aggregate' for I am .....
The Near Genius. 😏
07 May 15
Originally posted by RJHindsSo the molecular clouds in space are figments of the astronomers imagination?
A molecular cloud is a name given to something astronomers imagine to exist in outer space. They are not real molecules like the DNA molecules. I have no need to google the word 'aggregate' for I am .....
The Near Genius. 😏
07 May 15
Originally posted by sonhouseThey are making up things to describe what they appear to be seeing and therefore they can't back it up with real science because the ideas are imaginary fairy tales. Would you call that thinking for myself? 😏
So the molecular clouds in space are figments of the astronomers imagination?