1. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    06 Jan '07 01:08
    Originally posted by ivanhoe
    I don't remember I have ever made those claims. Please, give the relevant quotes.

    You are not talking to a group here (the "they" ), you are talking to individuals.
    Is the Bible internally inconsistent, and, in fact, wrong on several key points?
  2. Felicific Forest
    Joined
    15 Dec '02
    Moves
    48642
    06 Jan '07 01:101 edit
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    Is the Bible internally inconsistent, and, in fact, wrong on several key points?
    The Bible is a collection of books, it is not a scientific work about the universe. What a silly question this is.
  3. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    06 Jan '07 01:19
    Originally posted by ivanhoe
    The Bible is a collection of books, it is not a scientific work about the universe. What a silly question this is.
    You didn't answer the question.
  4. Felicific Forest
    Joined
    15 Dec '02
    Moves
    48642
    06 Jan '07 01:211 edit
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    You didn't answer the question.
    You apparently haven't read my reaction !
  5. Joined
    02 Apr '06
    Moves
    3637
    06 Jan '07 22:39
    I find it very hard to believe, but it has happened.

    By the power of sheer logic and overwhelming physical evidence, Lucifershammer has caused Agerg to disappear. Agerg is no more, no postings, no moves, nothing.

    A moments silence, chaps, if you please........
  6. Unknown Territories
    Joined
    05 Dec '05
    Moves
    20408
    06 Jan '07 22:46
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    Is the Bible internally inconsistent, and, in fact, wrong on several key points?
    I'll answer that one for you: no.
  7. Standard memberscottishinnz
    Kichigai!
    Osaka
    Joined
    27 Apr '05
    Moves
    8592
    06 Jan '07 23:35
    Originally posted by ivanhoe
    The Bible is a collection of books, it is not a scientific work about the universe. What a silly question this is.
    Would the fact that it is not a scientific book make internal inconsistancy okay?
  8. Standard memberscottishinnz
    Kichigai!
    Osaka
    Joined
    27 Apr '05
    Moves
    8592
    06 Jan '07 23:41
    Originally posted by FreakyKBH
    I'll answer that one for you: no.
    No - except for these

    http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/donald_morgan/inconsistencies.html
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_consistency_and_the_Bible
    http://www.cs.umd.edu/~mvz/bible/bible-inconsistencies.pdf
    http://www.answering-christianity.com/bs_and_lies.htm

    And tell me, if lobsters are an abomination before the lord, why did he make them?
  9. Unknown Territories
    Joined
    05 Dec '05
    Moves
    20408
    06 Jan '07 23:581 edit
    Originally posted by scottishinnz
    No - except for these

    http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/donald_morgan/inconsistencies.html
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_consistency_and_the_Bible
    http://www.cs.umd.edu/~mvz/bible/bible-inconsistencies.pdf
    http://www.answering-christianity.com/bs_and_lies.htm

    And tell me, if lobsters are an abomination before the lord, why did he make them?
    Anyone with half a brain can make any body of work appear internally consistent. Anyone with 3/4 of a brain can deduce the proper context to correct the supposed misinterpretation. Anyone in their right mind will let the text speak for itself.
  10. Standard memberscottishinnz
    Kichigai!
    Osaka
    Joined
    27 Apr '05
    Moves
    8592
    06 Jan '07 23:59
    Originally posted by FreakyKBH
    Anyone with half a brain can make any body of work [b]appear[/i] internally consistent. Anyone with 3/4 of a brain can deduce the proper context to correct the supposed misinterpretation. Anyone in their right mind will let the text speak for itself.
    What you mean is anybody who chooses to ignore the problems can make them go away.
  11. Unknown Territories
    Joined
    05 Dec '05
    Moves
    20408
    07 Jan '07 00:04
    Originally posted by scottishinnz
    What you mean is anybody who chooses to ignore the problems can make them go away.
    No, I mean exactly what you read. Only a fool would not consider context.
  12. Standard memberscottishinnz
    Kichigai!
    Osaka
    Joined
    27 Apr '05
    Moves
    8592
    07 Jan '07 00:10
    Originally posted by FreakyKBH
    No, I mean exactly what you read. Only a fool would not consider context.
    Only a fool would believe that crap.
  13. Unknown Territories
    Joined
    05 Dec '05
    Moves
    20408
    07 Jan '07 00:13
    Originally posted by scottishinnz
    Only a fool would believe that crap.
    At least my beliefs are defensible on grounds other than mob mentality.
  14. Standard memberscottishinnz
    Kichigai!
    Osaka
    Joined
    27 Apr '05
    Moves
    8592
    07 Jan '07 00:21
    Originally posted by FreakyKBH
    At least my beliefs are defensible on grounds other than mob mentality.
    You beliefs are ONLY defensible on mob mentality! You have no evidence for God!
  15. Felicific Forest
    Joined
    15 Dec '02
    Moves
    48642
    07 Jan '07 00:48
    Originally posted by scottishinnz
    No - except for these

    http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/donald_morgan/inconsistencies.html
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_consistency_and_the_Bible
    http://www.cs.umd.edu/~mvz/bible/bible-inconsistencies.pdf
    http://www.answering-christianity.com/bs_and_lies.htm

    And tell me, if lobsters are an abomination before the lord, why did he make them?
    Do you interprete scripture in a literal way .... the way the fundamentalists interprete scripture ?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree