1. Standard memberAgerg
    The 'edit'or
    converging to it
    Joined
    21 Aug '06
    Moves
    11458
    19 Aug '11 23:332 edits
    Wahey you got your own thread!!!

    Anyway, you fall into two categories...
    1) an utterly helpless fundamentalist zealot/moron so old and set in his ways that rational discussion and debate is a waste of time and effort, or
    2) A satirical genius who has thus far seduced us under his troll bridge, and for whom rational discussion and debate is a waste of time because we're actually preaching to the choir. Moreover your raison d'etre on these boards in this case forbidding you from revealing your true intent here (to demonstrate the retarded logic of fundamentalists) - I offer a low-key acknowledgement of your efforts.


    Either way, engaging you in discussion is a pointless exercise...have a nice day ;]
  2. Standard memberavalanchethecat
    Not actually a cat
    Joined
    09 Apr '10
    Moves
    14251
    20 Aug '11 00:02
    Originally posted by Agerg
    Wahey you got your own thread!!!

    Anyway, you fall into two categories...
    1) an utterly helpless fundamentalist zealot/moron so old and set in his ways that rational discussion and debate is a waste of time and effort, or
    2) A satirical genius who has thus far seduced us under his troll bridge, and for whom rational discussion and debate is a waste of time ...[text shortened]... orts.


    Either way, engaging you in discussion is a pointless exercise...have a nice day ;]
    Tough call - troll or not.
  3. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52618
    20 Aug '11 00:03
    Originally posted by avalanchethecat
    Tough call - troll or not.
    Stroll for the troll....
  4. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12694
    20 Aug '11 00:15
    Originally posted by Agerg
    Wahey you got your own thread!!!

    Anyway, you fall into two categories...
    1) an utterly helpless fundamentalist zealot/moron so old and set in his ways that rational discussion and debate is a waste of time and effort, or
    2) A satirical genius who has thus far seduced us under his troll bridge, and for whom rational discussion and debate is a waste of time ...[text shortened]... orts.


    Either way, engaging you in discussion is a pointless exercise...have a nice day ;]
    You are using my name in vain.
  5. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52618
    20 Aug '11 00:23
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    You are using my name in vain.
    Vain or artery?
  6. Joined
    14 May '03
    Moves
    89724
    20 Aug '11 00:41
    Originally posted by Agerg
    Wahey you got your own thread!!!

    Anyway, you fall into two categories...
    1) an utterly helpless fundamentalist zealot/moron so old and set in his ways that rational discussion and debate is a waste of time and effort, or
    2) A satirical genius who has thus far seduced us under his troll bridge, and for whom rational discussion and debate is a waste of time ...[text shortened]... orts.


    Either way, engaging you in discussion is a pointless exercise...have a nice day ;]
    Either he is the one of the greatest "method posters" of the modern era with the ability to sound like a complete whackjob nutter - or he is..........

    Conclusions have been drawn.
  7. Joined
    31 May '06
    Moves
    1795
    20 Aug '11 00:41
    Hey RJHinds is a paragon of sense compared to Dasa.

    He is though merrily continuing to trash evolution while ignoring my offer
    to explain how and why it works.

    Possibly it was the fact that my challenge ended with the assertion that if
    he accepted he would have to publicly admit to being wrong and that
    evolution was true at the end of it.

    Possibly he is too scared of the truth to accept the challenge.

    RJH, If not accept my challenge, you could at least respond to this...
    Specifically the part at the end in bold but any/all would be nice.

    (from the 'can you trust science' thread)

    ""
    "[u]Originally posted by RJHinds[/u]
    In the past it has always turned out that the Holy Bible was right.
    So I'm sticking with the tried and true.

    P.S. The predicament i was referring to is in your statement below:

    "When we want to explain something we have to do it in terms of other things
    we already understand. Otherwise if you explain something in terms of something
    we don't under ...[text shortened]... actual explanation of how or why this thing you are
    trying to explain worked/happened."




    "In the past it has always turned out that the Holy Bible was right.
    So I'm sticking with the tried and true."


    I am sorry but you can't possibly justify this.
    The bible isn't even self consistent.

    It also justifies;
    Murder,
    Incest,
    Rape,
    Genocide,
    Homophobia,
    Racism,
    plus is totally inconsistent and logically impossible.

    see this for starters.

    YouTube

    You're not sticking with tried and true, you're sticking with tried and failed.

    BTW here is a relevant speech given by the guy who created the above.

    YouTube

    and his homepage.

    http://thethinkingatheist.com/home

    Given he is in a much better position to explain what is wrong with the bible than
    I am.





    There is no predicament for scientists in the section you refer to.

    I am still at a loss to see what predicament you think there is so please explain
    what problem you think you see so I don't put words in your mouth or try to
    guess what you think the problem is."
    ""
  8. Joined
    10 Jun '11
    Moves
    3829
    20 Aug '11 00:48
    i think it's number 2 myself, though i wouldn't go as far as classifying "genius."
    however, it's not pointless to converse/debate with him as it provides for a mental exercise. keeps one sharp. i think my chess game has already improved.
  9. Joined
    31 May '06
    Moves
    1795
    20 Aug '11 01:41
    Originally posted by VoidSpirit
    i think it's number 2 myself, though i wouldn't go as far as classifying "genius."
    however, it's not pointless to converse/debate with him as it provides for a mental exercise. keeps one sharp. i think my chess game has already improved.
    also other people who read the posts might be swayed by a good argument even if he isn't.
  10. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12694
    20 Aug '11 04:26
    Originally posted by googlefudge
    Hey RJHinds is a paragon of sense compared to Dasa.

    He is though merrily continuing to trash evolution while ignoring my offer
    to explain how and why it works.

    Possibly it was the fact that my challenge ended with the assertion that if
    he accepted he would have to publicly admit to being wrong and that
    evolution was true at the end of it.

    Po ...[text shortened]... s in your mouth or try to
    guess what you think the problem is."
    [/i]""[/b]
    This guy can make some funny videos; but he is unconvincing to me
    because of his lies.
  11. Standard membermenace71
    Can't win a game of
    38N Lat X 121W Lon
    Joined
    03 Apr '03
    Moves
    140191
    20 Aug '11 05:02
    I just picture a big one eyed giant living under a bridge 😉



    Manny
  12. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Infidel
    Dunedin
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    45641
    20 Aug '11 05:50
    Is it just possible to ignore him?
    (I must admit up until now I have always taken the bait)
  13. Joined
    16 Feb '08
    Moves
    86369
    20 Aug '11 06:01
    Troll; Dasa too. Possibly the same person.
  14. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12694
    20 Aug '11 06:20
    Originally posted by googlefudge
    also other people who read the posts might be swayed by a good argument even if he isn't.
    I can not be swayed by a guy, who introduces lies into the biblical
    stories in order to be funny. I can enjoy the joke, knowing that
    it is only a joke and not the truth. This guy claims to have been a
    Christian. However, being raised in a Christian home does not
    automatically make one a Christian. He apparently never accepted
    Jesus the Christ as his Lord and Savior. So He lies again when he
    says he has been converted from Christianity to atheism, for he was
    never a Christian in the first place.
  15. Standard memberavalanchethecat
    Not actually a cat
    Joined
    09 Apr '10
    Moves
    14251
    20 Aug '11 10:11
    On balance I think I'm going to go with not-troll who is prone to troll-like behaviour.
Back to Top