11 Apr '11 04:27>
When I first heard of the Shroud of Turin, I was very
skeptical that this could possible have anything to do
with Jesus the Christ. The Roman Catholic Church
had this cloth, and since I am not a big fan of that
church, I considered it probably another gimmick to
get more money coming into the church. And then
when I heard the cloth had been carbon dated by
three separate labs to be only about 600 years old,
I was sure my first impression was right. There was
then speculation that someone had painted it, etc., etc.
All these speculations were proven wrong. More and
more evidence pointed to the fact that this cloth was
authentic. The only evidence against the fact that the
image on the cloth could be that of Jesus was the carbon
date. Because the the cloth had been repaired due to
fire damage at some point and other possible causes
of an incorrect carbon date, the 1988 dating has been
challenged. One suggestion was that the corner where
they took the sample was not the original cloth but part
of the repair work. There were some other suggestions
as to why the carbon dating could be wrong, but I will
not bother going into all these. Now, that I learned more
about it, I am not sure this cloth is a fake. It appears
that this cloth was on a man, who was crucified and
beaten in the same manner as Jesus the Christ, even if
the dating is correct. The mystery remains as to how
the photographic image appeared on this cloth. Does
anyone have any serious comments about this Shroud
of Turin? See one reference link below:
YouTube
skeptical that this could possible have anything to do
with Jesus the Christ. The Roman Catholic Church
had this cloth, and since I am not a big fan of that
church, I considered it probably another gimmick to
get more money coming into the church. And then
when I heard the cloth had been carbon dated by
three separate labs to be only about 600 years old,
I was sure my first impression was right. There was
then speculation that someone had painted it, etc., etc.
All these speculations were proven wrong. More and
more evidence pointed to the fact that this cloth was
authentic. The only evidence against the fact that the
image on the cloth could be that of Jesus was the carbon
date. Because the the cloth had been repaired due to
fire damage at some point and other possible causes
of an incorrect carbon date, the 1988 dating has been
challenged. One suggestion was that the corner where
they took the sample was not the original cloth but part
of the repair work. There were some other suggestions
as to why the carbon dating could be wrong, but I will
not bother going into all these. Now, that I learned more
about it, I am not sure this cloth is a fake. It appears
that this cloth was on a man, who was crucified and
beaten in the same manner as Jesus the Christ, even if
the dating is correct. The mystery remains as to how
the photographic image appeared on this cloth. Does
anyone have any serious comments about this Shroud
of Turin? See one reference link below:
YouTube