Originally posted by robbie carrobieYour answer to the question is a good one, but it still somewhat misses the mark. It sets out to show that the Bible sets a standard for marriage, and it achieves this well. I still don't see a "biblical definition" that so many anti-gays point to.
I answered your question, yet you have nothing to say in reply?
Originally posted by twhiteheadI personally cannot agree with you more.
I believe that democracy should never be used when restricting rights. This is why a constitution is necessary as it overrides democratic decisions that affect peoples rights. Of course the problem remains as to where the constitution comes from.
But to give an example of a problem that I have issues with - immigration. In general, the citizens of a co ...[text shortened]... ven when they do so it a democratic way, I see that as discrimination and a violation of rights.
Originally posted by JS357Mosaic Law is just that. Its application is limited to Jews. Yes, it's "biblical", yes, it's a God-given moral law. Fully applicable today? Not sure on this one, you'd probably be better off asking some Jews this question.
Thanks. A follow-up: Is Mosaic Law Biblical, that is, is it God-given moral law that is fully applicable today? (I hope my terminology like "God-given" and "moral law" and "applicable" is OK, if not, please correct.)
Edit: this question is for anyone who wants to answer.
1 edit
-Removed-I can't speak for God. 😛
The issue is cloudy in my mind DG. On one hand the Old testiment view of homosexuality is a capital offence.
Jesus saved a woman from being stoned.
I only know that God instructed me to love my brother. If I deny my homosexual neighbor's rights, then I slam my own family too. I have a close relative(female) who is bi-sexual. I have several gay and lezbian cousins and even a transgender.
So I am opposed to the idea being a straight Christian male, but as a human being, I can not see alienating my fellow man from certain benefits that they would get if they were married or common law with the opposite gender.
I'd have to say I am not sure if God opposes the idea of a gay-lez-whatever marriage as much as I'd say he he not in favor of homosexuality in general. I sort of think God would want a gay person to have the same rights as others. But that is my thinking and not the LORDs. 🙂
It's interesting that everybody looks at this from the 'adult' point of view.
A large portion of same-sex marriages eventually adopt children.
What about those children's rights, and the suitability of 'ALL' same-sex marriages to become suitable, unbiased parents?
I am saying some same-sex parents, as they become (whether thru adoption or artificial insemination) parents indeed, are no doubt suitable for the role and task of unbiased parent hood. What about those that are not?
Yes, throw back at me the unsuitability of some 'normal' (inverted commas) parents and we then have a concept that in normal circumstances I would agree with. However, the emotional bonding of a naturally born child between 2 sex parents plays a crucial role. Is this bonding possible in same-sex parents, with adoption or artificial insemination? I do wonder if a child will grow up 'normal' (inverted commas, again) in a same-sex marriage, psychologically speaking that is?
-m. 😉
Originally posted by mikelomMany "normal" couples are horrible parents also. Good and bad come in assorted faces. 🙂
It's interesting that everybody looks at this from the 'adult' point of view.
A large portion of same-sex marriages eventually adopt children.
What about those children's rights, and the suitability of 'ALL' same-sex marriages to become suitable, unbiased parents?
I am saying some same-sex parents, as they become (whether thru adoption or artificial ins ...[text shortened]... ted commas, again) in a same-sex marriage, psychologically speaking that is?
-m. 😉
2 edits
Originally posted by twhiteheadLets suppose for now that there is a world government and they control all immigration. Don't you think that government would have something to say if say, 100 million Chinese decided they wanted to immigrate to Panama? It seems to me there should be some kind of rules regarding immigration. Suppose under that world government 90% of Americans wanted to immigrate to Burmuda?
I believe that democracy should never be used when restricting rights. This is why a constitution is necessary as it overrides democratic decisions that affect peoples rights. Of course the problem remains as to where the constitution comes from.
But to give an example of a problem that I have issues with - immigration. In general, the citizens of a co ...[text shortened]... ven when they do so it a democratic way, I see that as discrimination and a violation of rights.
Do you think immigration should be just a free for all? Look at the boat people from Cuba, 1500 odd people, the majority of which were mental patients and hardened criminals, a way for the Cuban government to get rid of people they didn't want to have to deal with, foist them off to the USA?
