Summary of some recent threads

- There is no actual evidence to support the claim that the bible is the complete, inerrant word of god. This is a denominational handed-down Christian myth. Thread 192194

- it follows therefore that Christians, in fact all Christian “cherry pick” the bits they prefer to focus on Thread 192387

- we can also see from the bible itself that the “word of god” is not a book, it’s a person Thread 192402

- and that god has said “I will write my law on their hearts” not in a book Thread 192731

- they have stopped seeking for fresh truth, fresh revelation, daily manna, because their dogma is locked and written on metaphorical stone tablets Thread 192870 and Thread 192878

- despite these Christian claiming to “not like” the teaching of eternal suffering, none of them will condemn it even hypothetically Thread 192894

- even though they cannot provide an explanation for the pointless existence of an invisible secret hell Thread 192828

- and yet despite believing this awful nonsense they spend their time here at RHP Thread 191981

- because of this literalist adherence to the notion that the “few” will be saved combined with the doctrine of eternal suffering, the outcome is a depiction of God/Jesus who as a saviour is an utter failure Thread 192574

- and yet belief in all this nonsense about talking snakes and lakes of fire isn’t even a requirement for salvation Thread 192796 and Thread 192445

- so we have choice which gospel to believe Thread 192599

More people need to see this thread and realize that you cannot summarize ANYthing accurately and that you have an agenda to come up with the most outlandish threads (yes, these are ALL your threads) just so that you can berate, harass, and belittle Christians here.

Good job!


To the unwary:
Count up how many times in all these threads, he pressures people to answer him. Comments like "Yes or no??" and "Third (or seventh, or twelfth, or... ) time asking" even though they've already answered him every time he asks again. He doesn't even care if they answer or not. He's all about making the appearance of them not answering. He even claims to "checkmate" nearly every poster who disagrees with him.

These threads, indeed, ALL of this forum, has to be about him, or else the posters are "unprincipled", "dishonest", or "evading his questions".

@suzianne said
More people need to see this thread and realize that you cannot summarize ANYthing accurately and that you have an agenda to come up with the most outlandish threads (yes, these are ALL your threads) just so that you can berate, harass, and belittle Christians here.

Good job!


To the unwary:
Count up how many times in all these threads, he pressures people to answer ...[text shortened]... as to be about him, or else the posters are "unprincipled", "dishonest", or "evading his questions".

@kilroy70 said
He would do well to focus on ideas rather than vomiting up emotional responses. But after 15 years (seriously, 15?!!) I believe he has locked 🔐 himself into a tiny prison of his own making.

In the second paragraph of the opening statement he says "all Christian(s) cherry pick the bits they prefer to focus on." He claims to be a Christian, so how does he reconcile this wit ...[text shortened]... sion of cherry picking, or can he explain away this discrepancy with some fancy word salad footwork.

@divegeester said
The cowardly sock puppet advising the queen of paranoia.

Lol

@kilroy70 said
So how's the quest to abolish Hell going?

@divegeester said
Still strong after 15 years on my original username.

How about you?

@kilroy70 said
You seem to think I'm someone you already know. It's either that or assigning someone else's identity to a person who is relatively new is a part of your shtick.
So which is it? Are you firing shots in the air hoping to hit something, or do you think I'm someone you already know?

@divegeester said
There’s a lot of dicks posting here, you’re just another one on the sidelines.