1. Standard memberDasa
    Dasa
    Account suspended
    Joined
    20 May '10
    Moves
    8042
    28 Aug '11 21:44
    Originally posted by Conrau K
    It just occurs to me that since so much sperm is produced by the male (most of which is never ejaculated in coitu), that must be a very extravagant waste of 'life particles'. Surely it makes more sense to put them in the ova?
    It is this way because there needs to be the male and the female.

    This assures that the off spring has proper care by father and mother.

    Man has strong binds to his possessions and giving the life giving seed creates attachment.
  2. Windsor, Ontario
    Joined
    10 Jun '11
    Moves
    3829
    28 Aug '11 21:44
    Originally posted by Conrau K
    It just occurs to me that since so much sperm is produced by the male (most of which is never ejaculated in coitu), that must be a very extravagant waste of 'life particles'. Surely it makes more sense to put them in the ova?
    heaven help you if you masturbate. how many countless millions of souls does one murder in one lifetime?
  3. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    15 Sep '04
    Moves
    7051
    28 Aug '11 22:20
    Originally posted by Dasa
    It is this way because there needs to be the male and the female.

    This assures that the off spring has proper care by father and mother.

    Man has strong binds to his possessions and giving the life giving seed creates attachment.
    I don't understand. Are you suggesting now that the life particle resides equally in the male and female gametes?
  4. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    15 Sep '04
    Moves
    7051
    28 Aug '11 22:20
    Originally posted by VoidSpirit
    heaven help you if you masturbate. how many countless millions of souls does one murder in one lifetime?
    I expect Dasa would find masturbation morally abhorrent.
  5. Joined
    31 May '06
    Moves
    1795
    28 Aug '11 22:44
    Originally posted by Dasa
    It is this way because there needs to be the male and the female.

    This assures that the off spring has proper care by father and mother.

    Man has strong binds to his possessions and giving the life giving seed creates attachment.
    This totally explains all the deadbeat dads... no wait....


    Wouldn't it be simpler to just design humans to be caring to their offspring
    rather than make them possessive (and look how well that works out) and
    then try to give them a reason to be possessive of their child?

    Although given that children are your genetic inheritance, don't you have that
    already?

    If you deity has gone to the trouble of making such a strong mechanism to
    enforce good parenting, How come it fails so often?

    In other words... How incompetent is your god?
  6. Standard memberSoothfast
    0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,
    Planet Rain
    Joined
    04 Mar '04
    Moves
    2701
    29 Aug '11 03:56
    Originally posted by ChessPraxis
    Gingers have no soul. FACT!
    According to the Book of Cartman, perhaps, but the science is still lacking...
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree