Originally posted by Conrau KIt is this way because there needs to be the male and the female.
It just occurs to me that since so much sperm is produced by the male (most of which is never ejaculated in coitu), that must be a very extravagant waste of 'life particles'. Surely it makes more sense to put them in the ova?
This assures that the off spring has proper care by father and mother.
Man has strong binds to his possessions and giving the life giving seed creates attachment.
Originally posted by Conrau Kheaven help you if you masturbate. how many countless millions of souls does one murder in one lifetime?
It just occurs to me that since so much sperm is produced by the male (most of which is never ejaculated in coitu), that must be a very extravagant waste of 'life particles'. Surely it makes more sense to put them in the ova?
Originally posted by DasaI don't understand. Are you suggesting now that the life particle resides equally in the male and female gametes?
It is this way because there needs to be the male and the female.
This assures that the off spring has proper care by father and mother.
Man has strong binds to his possessions and giving the life giving seed creates attachment.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
Originally posted by DasaThis totally explains all the deadbeat dads... no wait....
It is this way because there needs to be the male and the female.
This assures that the off spring has proper care by father and mother.
Man has strong binds to his possessions and giving the life giving seed creates attachment.
Wouldn't it be simpler to just design humans to be caring to their offspring
rather than make them possessive (and look how well that works out) and
then try to give them a reason to be possessive of their child?
Although given that children are your genetic inheritance, don't you have that
already?
If you deity has gone to the trouble of making such a strong mechanism to
enforce good parenting, How come it fails so often?
In other words... How incompetent is your god?
