09 Sep '12 12:01>
This is a cut from an online book "Spacious Passion" by Ngakma Nor’dzin Pamo in the Dzogchen Nyingma Tibetan Buddhist tradition, that I am starting found a few gems, now mounting. Here's a brief one for those interested in such things.
http://www.spacious-passion.org/shared/text/s/spacious_passion_ch_02_skymind_01_matrix_eng.php
"....Opposite the venue for a day of teachings in 2003, was a derelict school with nearly all the windows smashed. As I verbalised my disapproval of the vandalism, Ngak’chang Rinpoche quietly observed that it was pretty skilful stone-throwing that succeeded in smashing the uppermost windows, and that it must have been a satisfying experience. I was jolted into an awareness of the two viewpoints. I allowed these two ‘opposing’ viewpoints to play in my mind, without indulging the need to decide which was the ‘correct’ view. A tantrika recognises the naked clarity of energy without limiting it through moralistic or conventional definitions: of ‘misdeed’ for destroying a building or of ‘skill’ for the accuracy of aim. Vajrayana dances with such ambiguity. I was well aware that Ngak’chang Rinpoche was not speaking from a laissez-faire attitude concerning vandalism – but simply offering me the opportunity to become aware of my knee-jerk response to this particular aspect of life circumstances."
http://www.spacious-passion.org/shared/text/s/spacious_passion_ch_02_skymind_01_matrix_eng.php
"....Opposite the venue for a day of teachings in 2003, was a derelict school with nearly all the windows smashed. As I verbalised my disapproval of the vandalism, Ngak’chang Rinpoche quietly observed that it was pretty skilful stone-throwing that succeeded in smashing the uppermost windows, and that it must have been a satisfying experience. I was jolted into an awareness of the two viewpoints. I allowed these two ‘opposing’ viewpoints to play in my mind, without indulging the need to decide which was the ‘correct’ view. A tantrika recognises the naked clarity of energy without limiting it through moralistic or conventional definitions: of ‘misdeed’ for destroying a building or of ‘skill’ for the accuracy of aim. Vajrayana dances with such ambiguity. I was well aware that Ngak’chang Rinpoche was not speaking from a laissez-faire attitude concerning vandalism – but simply offering me the opportunity to become aware of my knee-jerk response to this particular aspect of life circumstances."