03 Feb '09 13:03>
Three down. Two to go.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe composition of the jurors was agreed to by both participants. The time for that sort of complaint would have been before the debate started, not after.
the whole thing was rigged! how many theist judges were there compared to atheist, that what i want to know!
Originally posted by rwingettI was going to mention it, but i figured that it would be thrown out on the pretext that they would not let there personal feelings interfere with their judgments, that they would remain impartial and objective, which i have no reason to dismiss, however, if i was a defendant being tried for theistic inclinations and practices in front of an atheistic jury, i would have cause for concern, would i not, but so be it, i have no other grounds on which to call into question the validity of the debate!
The composition of the jurors was agreed to by both participants. The time for that sort of complaint would have been before the debate started, not after.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieTo be honest, I think most of the judges disagreed with the initial position of rwingett, so if anybody could have a reason to be afraid of impartiality problems is him.
I was going to mention it, but i figured that it would be thrown out on the pretext that they would not let there personal feelings interfere with their judgments, that they would remain impartial and objective, which i have no reason to dismiss, however, if i was a defendant being tried for theistic inclinations and practices in front of an atheisti ...[text shortened]... but so be it, i have no other grounds on which to call into question the validity of the debate!
Originally posted by PalynkaThat sounds like a bit of an assumption Pal. I trust it won't affect your thought process?
To be honest, I think most of the judges disagreed with the initial position of rwingett, so if anybody could have a reason to be afraid of impartiality problems is him.
Originally posted by PalynkaOh, I can take up rwingett's thesis any minute -his two posts against my two texts that I posted at this thread, without the slightest change, and with as many judges as he wants (the judges will be choosen solely by him and I will accept his proposal in full).
I just wanted to add that being a judge is easy, so please take any of my "criticisms" as from a coward who didn't want to take rwingett up on this one.
Originally posted by rwingettIf you want to know the meaning of life, the universe and everything, I can tell you now it's not 42.
[b]***********VICTORY!!!!************
I wish to thank the judges for helping me prove beyond any possible doubt that Jesus was a socialist. By at least a 3 to 2 vote the truth has been clearly recognized and can henceforth be carved in stone. Fact: Jesus was a socialist. Every Christian denomination will now be required to alter their dogma to confor ...[text shortened]... reality leaves them ill prepared to deal with a more factually grounded understanding of Jesus.[/b]