1. Joined
    12 Feb '07
    Moves
    564
    04 Mar '07 01:58
    Originally posted by kirksey957
    But are there not examples in the Bible of Jesus and God changing?
    there are not. If you look at each time where God promises to wipe out His people and doesn't, it is because Israel gets it that they have to follow Him and change their ways. God can say "you didn't follow Me so you will die now" and then the people say "we repent" (which later on Jesus says to always forgive if they repent), and God would say "Ok".

    But Israel kept sliding away from God. God never changed His mind. His people changed their position.
  2. Joined
    12 Feb '07
    Moves
    564
    04 Mar '07 02:02
    Originally posted by bbarr
    If he acts in time he cannot be changeless.
    Why can't He be? Again, to staple the limit of time to Him would be to remove His omnipotence. Besides, even if He acted in time, it would be His time, not our definition of time. "His thoughts are not our thoughts, and His ways are not our ways."
  3. Donationbbarr
    Chief Justice
    Center of Contention
    Joined
    14 Jun '02
    Moves
    17381
    04 Mar '07 09:33
    Originally posted by jonesyuno34
    Why can't He be? Again, to staple the limit of time to Him would be to remove His omnipotence. Besides, even if He acted in time, it would be His time, not our definition of time. "His thoughts are not our thoughts, and His ways are not our ways."
    Because acts are events, and events occur in time. There was a time before which God had incarnated himself as man, and a later time when God had incarnated himself as man. So, there was a time when God had the property of not being incarnated as man and a time at which God had the property of being incarnated as man. So, God has different properties at different times. So, God changes. If you want to make up different senses of common words, then fine. But I'm not interested in those claims; claims that employ alternate and ad hoc notions of common words.
  4. Joined
    12 Feb '07
    Moves
    564
    04 Mar '07 09:46
    Originally posted by bbarr
    Because acts are events, and events occur in time. There was a time before which God had incarnated himself as man, and a later time when God had incarnated himself as man. So, there was a time when God had the property of not being incarnated as man and a time at which God had the property of being incarnated as man. So, God has different properties at dif ...[text shortened]... rested in those claims; claims that employ alternate and ad hoc notions of common words.
    This is in the Bible is it?
  5. Donationbbarr
    Chief Justice
    Center of Contention
    Joined
    14 Jun '02
    Moves
    17381
    04 Mar '07 10:15
    Originally posted by jonesyuno34
    This is in the Bible is it?
    So, which part of the above argument do you take issue with?
  6. Joined
    12 Feb '07
    Moves
    564
    04 Mar '07 10:201 edit
    I see you're in philosophy. I am first curious about your religious stance, if you have one.

    impressive chess record, by the way
  7. Donationbbarr
    Chief Justice
    Center of Contention
    Joined
    14 Jun '02
    Moves
    17381
    04 Mar '07 10:57
    Originally posted by jonesyuno34
    I see you're in philosophy. I am first curious about your religious stance, if you have one.

    impressive chess record, by the way
    I only have philosophical stances. Thanks, by the way.
  8. Donationkirksey957
    Outkast
    With White Women
    Joined
    31 Jul '01
    Moves
    91452
    04 Mar '07 13:00
    Originally posted by josephw
    God doesn't change, he just changes what he does!
    I think I alluded to this once before in another thread, but it didn't go far.
    This opens up a whole can of worms in my opinion. Let's say that I am a terrible sinner (murder, adulterer, liar, and fat to boot). I have a "Damascus Road" experience and come to be a person of tremendous faith. I have changed by behavior and actions. Are you saying I haven't really changed?

    What's so bad with the idea of God "changing?" If anything, it would tend to indicate that there is a relationship with his creation that is taken into consideration.
  9. Jo'Burg South Africa
    Joined
    20 Mar '06
    Moves
    69912
    05 Mar '07 10:571 edit
    Originally posted by scottishinnz
    How do you know this???

    You don't. You're just another phony apologist.
    I just believe in it. Nothing wrong with it.

    Edit: jou ma is 'n phony
  10. Standard memberscottishinnz
    Kichigai!
    Osaka
    Joined
    27 Apr '05
    Moves
    8592
    05 Mar '07 21:39
    Originally posted by Nicksten
    I just believe in it. Nothing wrong with it.

    Edit: jou ma is 'n phony
    And some believe that 9/11 was staged, and some believe that man never walked on the moon, and some believe that the earth is flat, and goes through space on the back of a giant turtle.

    You know what "beliefs" are worth? Not too much - facts is where it's at!
  11. Jo'Burg South Africa
    Joined
    20 Mar '06
    Moves
    69912
    06 Mar '07 01:21
    Originally posted by scottishinnz
    And some believe that 9/11 was staged, and some believe that man never walked on the moon, and some believe that the earth is flat, and goes through space on the back of a giant turtle.

    You know what "beliefs" are worth? Not too much - facts is where it's at!
    Like I said, that all was well thought-out by God when He created earth and man. Any designer and or developer etc also go through the same thing to where you have to plan. Planning is everything. What is the use of creating anything if you're not gonna do something with it?
  12. Standard memberscottishinnz
    Kichigai!
    Osaka
    Joined
    27 Apr '05
    Moves
    8592
    06 Mar '07 01:42
    Originally posted by Nicksten
    Like I said, that all was well thought-out by God when He created earth and man. Any designer and or developer etc also go through the same thing to where you have to plan. Planning is everything. What is the use of creating anything if you're not gonna do something with it?
    I ain't heard a whole lot of evidence there! Just another lot of woolly suppositions and opinions.
  13. Hmmm . . .
    Joined
    19 Jan '04
    Moves
    22131
    06 Mar '07 04:25
    Originally posted by jonesyuno34
    I see you're in philosophy. I am first curious about your religious stance, if you have one.

    impressive chess record, by the way
    Jonah 3:10 “When God saw what they did, how they turned from their evil ways, God changed his mind about the calamity that he had said he would bring upon them; and he did not do it. 4:1 But this was very displeasing to Jonah, and he became angry.”

    Yes the people of Nineveh “turned from their evil ways” according to the story. But that was not God’s message via Jonah. The promise was of their destruction—no ifs ands or buts. God’s “word” was communicated to the people of Nineveh; God then changed God’s mind, and Jonah, being God’s “mouthpiece,” was displeased.

    And that is precisely the point of the whole story: it is an allegory for those who want to put God in a box—especially a box where they think they know who is saved and who is condemned, and what the rules are, often based on some idolatrous notion of “God’s word.”
    __________________________

    Also, if “incarnation” is taken as a unique, historical “once upon a time” event, then bbarr is quite correct. On the other hand, if Jesus is taken as a “sacramental” symbol and exemplar of the logos tou theou as it manifests in/as humanity...
  14. Jo'Burg South Africa
    Joined
    20 Mar '06
    Moves
    69912
    06 Mar '07 08:21
    Originally posted by scottishinnz
    I ain't heard a whole lot of evidence there! Just another lot of woolly suppositions and opinions.
    1. I wasnt trying to prove anything...
    2. and yes, I was only giving my opinions regarding the subject.

    Its clear that your opinions differ from mine. End of story?
  15. Standard memberscottishinnz
    Kichigai!
    Osaka
    Joined
    27 Apr '05
    Moves
    8592
    06 Mar '07 08:39
    Originally posted by Nicksten
    1. I wasnt trying to prove anything...
    2. and yes, I was only giving my opinions regarding the subject.

    Its clear that your opinions differ from mine. End of story?
    Perhaps not stating things as facts when they are merely opinions would be wise in the future.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree