07 Dec '05 20:10>
Originally posted by ivanhoe🙂
Of course He did.
Originally posted by ivanhoeWhen it's written down.
As you stated to adhere to the above principles, we can take a closer look.
You formulation leaves a lot to be desired, in particular for a lawyer.
[b]Marauder: "- a fundamentalist must adhere to a strict and literal basic principle."
How, marauder, can a basic principle be "literal" ?[/b]
Originally posted by sasquatch672I am not.
Of course there are fundamentalists. You're one of them.
There are reformers today, particularly in the Presbyterian church. They're the ones advocating gay marriage. They're certainly in their religion, but they're reformers just the same.
Pope John Paul II (or, as you know him, Satan) was a fundamentalist Catholic. There are reformis ...[text shortened]... didn't try to unnaturally deny their physical impulses during their prime reproductive years.)
Originally posted by sasquatch672Sas: "Pope John Paul II (or, as you know him, Satan) was a fundamentalist Catholic."
Of course there are fundamentalists. You're one of them.
There are reformers today, particularly in the Presbyterian church. They're the ones advocating gay marriage. They're certainly in their religion, but they're reformers just the same.
Pope John Paul II (or, as you know him, Satan) was a fundamentalist Catholic. There are reformis ...[text shortened]... didn't try to unnaturally deny their physical impulses during their prime reproductive years.)
Originally posted by sasquatch672I'll have the same, thanks.
I am renaming this thread. I am going to formally petition Russ to have the ability to change the names of threads, but I am temporarily granting myself this power until it is officially effected. I am renaming this thread the Seinfeld Thread. Because this surely is The Thread About Nothing.
I have never seen someone waste so much time trying to f ...[text shortened]... however, that you simply carried on the thing I asked you not to do in my thread in this thread.