Originally posted by ZahlanziIt sounds like that site which purports to espouse critical thinking, seems to be saying in the episodes listed more that they are interested in politically correct thinking. For instance the first dude, listed as a scientist, which would indicate he is the evolution believer and the other dude a creationist, would indicate that the scientist should have realized the other dude was not civilized by his first foray into the subject at hand, creationism V evolution and not continued to argue with a person who thinks with his fists or worse.
in denying evolution?
http://www.whatstheharm.net/evolutiondenial.html
Originally posted by RJHindsNo, they do not necessarily deny God's role in creation, either. For example, I believe God created the universe, but that modern cosmological theory, aka the 'Big Bang', was how he did it. Evolution, similarly, was his tool to create all the life on our planet. So, neither evolution nor the Big Bang deny God.
Well, evolutionists deny that creation was an act of God. Is that better?
Originally posted by SuzianneI believe you would be called a theistic evolutionist. However, there are the atheist evolutionists that I was really referring to.
No, they do not necessarily deny God's role in creation, either. For example, I believe God created the universe, but that modern cosmological theory, aka the 'Big Bang', was how he did it. Evolution, similarly, was his tool to create all the life on our planet. So, neither evolution nor the Big Bang deny God.
Originally posted by RJHindsSo when you said
I believe you would be called a theistic evolutionist. However, there are the atheist evolutionists that I was really referring to.
"Well, evolutionists deny that creation was an act of God. "
You really meant to say;
"Well, atheist evolutionists deny that creation was an act of God. "
Which doesn't add much to the debate.
