1. Standard memberchaney3
    Bring it on.......
    Joined
    26 Dec '14
    Moves
    29912
    19 Nov '18 20:20
    They cannot discuss origin of life.
    They cannot explain emotions.
    They cannot explain why food exists.
    They cannot explain why humans get hungry and tons of food exist.
    They cannot explain love.

    Atheists exists in a dumb world.
  2. Standard memberchaney3
    Bring it on.......
    Joined
    26 Dec '14
    Moves
    29912
    19 Nov '18 20:34
    @chaney3 said
    They cannot discuss origin of life.
    They cannot explain emotions.
    They cannot explain why food exists.
    They cannot explain why humans get hungry and tons of food exist.
    They cannot explain love.

    Atheists exists in a dumb world.
    This is just to start.
    Science cannot fully explain the human digestive system, nor the anal cavity.
  3. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    19 Nov '18 21:46
    @chaney3 said
    This is just to start.
    Science cannot fully explain the human digestive system, nor the anal cavity.
    What does it mean to "fully" explain something?
  4. Standard memberchaney3
    Bring it on.......
    Joined
    26 Dec '14
    Moves
    29912
    19 Nov '18 21:48
    @kazetnagorra said
    What does it mean to "fully" explain something?
    What can you explain?
    Not much.
  5. Devonshire
    Joined
    16 Feb '08
    Moves
    86846
    19 Nov '18 21:53
    C3 vs KN

    Popcorn munching mode activated.
  6. Standard memberchaney3
    Bring it on.......
    Joined
    26 Dec '14
    Moves
    29912
    19 Nov '18 21:58
    @divegeester said
    C3 vs KN

    Popcorn munching mode activated.
    C3 wins debate, no problem.
    Put away popcorn.
  7. Standard memberchaney3
    Bring it on.......
    Joined
    26 Dec '14
    Moves
    29912
    19 Nov '18 22:23
    @chaney3 said
    They cannot discuss origin of life.
    They cannot explain emotions.
    They cannot explain why food exists.
    They cannot explain why humans get hungry and tons of food exist.
    They cannot explain love.

    Atheists exists in a dumb world.
    4 thumbs down?
    Yet no opinions?
    Cowards.
  8. Standard memberwolfgang59
    howling mad
    In the den
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    45641
    20 Nov '18 02:37
    @chaney3

    Dunning-Kruger
  9. SubscriberWOLFE63
    Tra il dire e il far
    C'e di mezzo il mar!
    Joined
    06 Nov '15
    Moves
    18639
    20 Nov '18 02:52
    @chaney3 said
    4 thumbs down?
    Yet no opinions?
    Cowards.
    You lost me when you proposed exploring the depths of anal cavities. 😳
  10. Joined
    15 Dec '03
    Moves
    277409
    20 Nov '18 03:26
    So. How do you feel about agnostics?
  11. SubscriberGhost of a Duke
    A Spirited Misfit
    in London
    Joined
    14 Mar '15
    Moves
    9417
    20 Nov '18 08:39
    @kquinn909 said
    So. How do you feel about agnostics?
    I'm undecided.
  12. Devonshire
    Joined
    16 Feb '08
    Moves
    86846
    20 Nov '18 08:551 edit
    @wolfgang59 said
    @chaney3

    Dunning-Kruger
    I recently came across the word "pecksniffian" when considering chaney3's odd attitude to his "Christianity" [sic] and his interactions with the other members of this community.
  13. Standard memberwolfgang59
    howling mad
    In the den
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    45641
    20 Nov '18 09:13
    @divegeester said
    I recently came across the word "pecksniffian" when considering chaney3's odd attitude to his "Christianity" [sic] and his interactions with the other members of this community.
    Great word!
    (thanks google)
    Sounds like a noun .. but isn't ... pity!
  14. Standard memberchaney3
    Bring it on.......
    Joined
    26 Dec '14
    Moves
    29912
    20 Nov '18 16:17
    Origin of life? Anyone?

    You may disagree with the version in Genesis, but you have nothing else to offer.
  15. Standard memberchaney3
    Bring it on.......
    Joined
    26 Dec '14
    Moves
    29912
    20 Nov '18 16:54
    @chaney3 said
    Origin of life? Anyone?

    You may disagree with the version in Genesis, but you have nothing else to offer.
    Face it, any life that formed 'by magic' would likely have not survived, unless that life form came to be in an adult state.

    The chicken or egg hypothesis rings true here, because the egg and what it produced would not have survived.

    Only a 'created' adult species could have survived the elements.

    "Survival of the fittest" is a generic term, because anything in an infant state needs help to survive.
Back to Top