21 Aug '13 06:51>
Originally posted by RJHindsWell Gee, maybe it's because the whole thing is full of shyte. Like totally manmade, no help from a god which would make sense, for instance, how did the animals in Madagascar get to Noah, or the seals in Antarctica. All you have to do is do a bit of local thinking, that is to say, the grey cells inside your own head and think about those tiny inconsistencies and you have to throw out the whole ball of wax.
Why Does the Bible Mention Unicorns?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNsjsbJLaM
The Instructor
Originally posted by sonhouseIt is foolish to try to judge the past on the present. We know things were different in the past.
Well Gee, maybe it's because the whole thing is full of shyte. Like totally manmade, no help from a god which would make sense, for instance, how did the animals in Madagascar get to Noah, or the seals in Antarctica. All you have to do is do a bit of local thinking, that is to say, the grey cells inside your own head and think about those tiny inconsistencies and you have to throw out the whole ball of wax.
Originally posted by RJHindsAh, you were there. I didn't think you were that old. You always bring that up when scientists talk about the past so whats good for the goose.....
It is foolish to try to judge the past on the present. We know things were different in the past.
The Instructor
Originally posted by AThousandYoungWell, the King James translators apparently believed the references where to the rhinoceros and especially to the big one-horned rhinoceros that was called a unicorn at that time. Actually it still is called a unicorn scientifically.
It doesn't.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Re%E2%80%99em