Since this god would know exactly why people get sick eating pig, by saying don't eat pigs, first it is saying eating animal flesh is ok and second don't eat pig because I say so.
Why would a real god encode it thus instead of just telling the people there is a tiny sickness inside some pigs so here is how you can eliminate that: then tell about how to raise and cook them so that trichinosis (as we know it now) is killed and therefore the pig is safe to eat.
Could it be that the restriction made thus in a religious setting is there because it did not come from a god?
Originally posted by sonhouseid say so. either that or god didnt want people to realise that a bacon sandwich is better than heaven.
Since this god would know exactly why people get sick eating pig, by saying don't eat pigs, first it is saying eating animal flesh is ok and second don't eat pig because I say so.
Why would a real god encode it thus instead of just telling the people there is a tiny sickness inside some pigs so here is how you can eliminate that: then tell about how to r ...[text shortened]... at the restriction made thus in a religious setting is there because it did not come from a god?
Originally posted by sonhouseIt was a rumor started by the National Cattlemen's Beef Association.
Since this god would know exactly why people get sick eating pig, by saying don't eat pigs, first it is saying eating animal flesh is ok and second don't eat pig because I say so.
Why would a real god encode it thus instead of just telling the people there is a tiny sickness inside some pigs so here is how you can eliminate that: then tell about how to r ...[text shortened]... at the restriction made thus in a religious setting is there because it did not come from a god?
Originally posted by sonhouseThat is an old rule for the people in the wilderness. We Christians can eat pigs. I just had two pork chops at Cracker Barrel yesterday.
Since this god would know exactly why people get sick eating pig, by saying don't eat pigs, first it is saying eating animal flesh is ok and second don't eat pig because I say so.
Why would a real god encode it thus instead of just telling the people there is a tiny sickness inside some pigs so here is how you can eliminate that: then tell about how to r ...[text shortened]... at the restriction made thus in a religious setting is there because it did not come from a god?
Originally posted by RJHindsThat was just an example showing a god did not make those restrictions yet it ended up in the bible anyway. It just shows you there is little you can trust in the bible coming from a god.
That is an old rule for the people in the wilderness. We Christians can eat pigs. I just had two pork chops at Cracker Barrel yesterday.
Originally posted by sonhouseIt was needed in the Law for those days, but God sent Christ into the world to make a new covenant of freedom to eat pork, etc. if cleaned first.
That was just an example showing a god did not make those restrictions yet it ended up in the bible anyway. It just shows you there is little you can trust in the bible coming from a god.
Originally posted by RJHindsIt was NOT needed in those days. What was NEEDED was knowledge of what was going on to make people sick not just a religious edict to stop eating pork. That is my whole point. PEOPLE would say that because they knew nothing about the real issue. A god would have and would have said 'if you are going to eat pork, just make sure it's well cooked. There are tiny animals inside some of them that can hurt you'.
It was needed in the Law for those days, but God sent Christ into the world to make a new covenant of freedom to eat pork, etc. if cleaned first.
That's what a real god would have done, not this mealy mouthed zero knowledge edict that could have come from any human with any brains after putting 2 and 2 together and seeing how some people get sick after eating pig.
I think the concept came about because most people are like pigs and cannabalism is bad.
However, that being said, I'm led to believe that pork (if not salted or cooled) rots very fast.
Considering where and when these religious laws were laid down, it seems quite probable that they were to keep folk healthy, rather than divine.
Originally posted by sonhouseReally? And how many people cutting up pigs and saying "I don't see any tiny animals inside these pigs. This God guy is wacko" would it take before everyone said "Bah, this religion sucks".
It was NOT needed in those days. What was NEEDED was knowledge of what was going on to make people sick not just a religious edict to stop eating pork. That is my whole point. PEOPLE would say that because they knew nothing about the real issue. A god would have and would have said 'if you are going to eat pork, just make sure it's well cooked. There are ti ...[text shortened]... any brains after putting 2 and 2 together and seeing how some people get sick after eating pig.
Originally posted by shavixmirYes, I can agree with this, because especially in the days before refrigerators, pigs were a relatively poor choice for a healthy meal. Try leaving even cooked bacon out in the sun and then scarf it down and see what happens. The fat spoils quickly.
I think the concept came about because most people are like pigs and cannabalism is bad.
However, that being said, I'm led to believe that pork (if not salted or cooled) rots very fast.
Considering where and when these religious laws were laid down, it seems quite probable that they were to keep folk healthy, rather than divine.
Welcome back, Shav, it's been a while.
Originally posted by SuzianneYeah... I was out hunting vampires, ghouls and Christians.
Yes, I can agree with this, because especially in the days before refrigerators, pigs were a relatively poor choice for a healthy meal. Try leaving even cooked bacon out in the sun and then scarf it down and see what happens. The fat spoils quickly.
Welcome back, Shav, it's been a while.
Originally posted by sonhouseMaybe this is biblical evidence for the MFAP hypothesis, which people might remember being discussed in the Science forum a few years ago.
Since this god would know exactly why people get sick eating pig, by saying don't eat pigs, first it is saying eating animal flesh is ok and second don't eat pig because I say so.
Why would a real god encode it thus instead of just telling the people there is a tiny sickness inside some pigs so here is how you can eliminate that: then tell about how to r ...[text shortened]... at the restriction made thus in a religious setting is there because it did not come from a god?
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2013/07/02/the-mfap-hypothesis-for-the-origins-of-homo-sapiens/
Originally posted by DeepThoughtSo don't eat pig because that would be akin to cannibalism?
Maybe this is biblical evidence for the MFAP hypothesis, which people might remember being discussed in the Science forum a few years ago.
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2013/07/02/the-mfap-hypothesis-for-the-origins-of-homo-sapiens/
Though shalt not eat pigs for they are thy brothers.
Originally posted by HandyAndy"Ooooooh! This doesn't sound like the usual mindless, boring "gettin'-to-know-you" chit chat. That sounds like you actually have somethin' to say."
And sisters.
Got your panties in a twist, Andy? Well, spit it out, "sister"!
(Although if you're just "covering your tracks" again, don't bother.)