25 Jul '11 07:28>
Originally posted by pyxelatedWOW........
Talk about being smothered by words......
I don't think I'll be able to hold a discussion with you if every word gets a paragraph response! I don't even know which of your responses are the most important (for you!) to get a response back from me.
But here goes:
1) GKC wrote a book: "Orthodoxy", which I've got. Hence my remark.
2) I didn't even know you are RC. Seriously. Thanks for telling me. I have no problem with the RC church. (Now PLEASE don't latch on to this and say: "But you said.........!" Amongst other things, I am a member of a Contemplative Community which includes RC priests and nuns, Methodists, Dutch Reformed and several other denominations and undenominated persons like me.)
3) Infallibility. I never intended this in the strict technical sense that you interpreted it. But, in view of 2), I now understand. What I meant is simply the "I am right, you are wrong" paradigm. With the (unteachable) added implication: "I am not even prepared to consider the remote possibility that I might be a teensy weensy little bit wrong!"
4) I agree with Paul's teaching which says that we should be prepared to give an account of what we believe at all times. That means (to me) that if somebody explicitly asks me, I will reply. But I will not try to convince anybody else to adopt my particular position.
5) My own (continuing) spiritual journey is quite similar to Huston Smith. Christ is my centre, but I believe that Christ is bigger than Christianity! (Now THERE is something to latch on to.....)
6) Finally, blessings on your own personal spiritual journey. I have no quarrel with you!
In peace
CJ