Originally posted by @suzianneI think that there is a difference between making a judgement about what is good and evil and looking for it in other people.
Some make that call, yes, and some get it disastrously wrong, because we are human, and we err. We do not have the "responsibility" to get it wrong. This is why we are told not to judge; unfortunately, some cannot resist.
First let me say that two of you, Ghost and Dive have decided to request dj2becker just stop responding to you.
Realize that this mostly gives the impression that he may be exposing the weaknesses in some of your arguments.
There are plenty of posters who are more obnoxious then dj2becker. I mean - mean spirited, insulting, poisoning the well of discussion.
The fact that two of you have taken this approach could even suggest collusion. It looks that way a bit - a coordinated scheme.
2 edits
-Removed-
1 Tell me sonship if you LOVED someone that much would you then torture them for eternity if they rejected you?
2 Can you honestly not see how utterly utterly nonsensical, amoral, and incoherent this teaching is?
Both of these simple questions require a prefix of either yes or no, before any explanation please.
No, I reserve the right not to respond with a simple binary Yes or No, not when I want to examine the matter in depth.
Now, if you want to force me to a binary answer, and insist anything beyond one word is "waffle" or boring, tell me.
Are you going to let me examine in depth the issues of your questions as I want to?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI think this would make the point that he has little ground to accuse others of dodging.
Should we make a list of the questions that divegeester is avoiding?
The same is true of FMF. But a better use of your time, I think, IF Ghost and Dive refuse to be responded to by you, is to just point out what is wrong with some of their arguments.
The more important ones, I think, would be helpful.