Originally posted by @fmf*sigh* - oh well I tried several times asking you to rephrase as I clearly don't understood you the first time, HEY, I just realized I was asking you the same over and over like a parrot - you got me there 😉
Perhaps you are simply not clever enough to discuss things with me. The post was cogent and on-topic. Oh well. 😉
Just because you're so clever, I would have assumed you would know the difference that by not understanding something doesn't mean you're not clever - if you don't understand you don't understand, but I guess you don't understand.
Originally posted by @fmfNow if you were clever enough fmf, you'd realize now that you're the one doing the sidestepping. Waisted too much time with you already over something that was meant to be so simple.
Perhaps you are simply not clever enough to discuss things with me. The post was cogent and on-topic. Oh well. 😉
[b]Just rephrase so I can answer - or stick with whatever you think is okay. Doesn't bother me at all.
No it's OK, it turns out yours is the torturer god ideology. Subsequent posts have made that clear. Good for you.[/b]
Originally posted by @nickstenI understand that you didn't want to answer the simple discursive challenge that I posed you after your disappointing first foray.
Just because you're so clever, I would have assumed you would know the difference that by not understanding something doesn't mean you're not clever - if you don't understand you don't understand, but I guess you don't understand.
It's interesting that dj2becker - when posting as Fetchmyjunk - said he did not believe in the endless burning of non-believers in "hell" theology - and now he seems to. There was a poster called lemon lime who thought the endless burning of non-believers in "hell" doctrine was nonsense and had done so for 40 years but who then adopted the ideology - in the space of a couple of thread pages - in order to be able to criticise divegeester for not believing it!