Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Sports Forum

Sports Forum

  1. 26 Aug '08 10:56
    the politians say we the public are behind the games i vote no.
    any one out there care to vote.
  2. 26 Aug '08 11:51
    Originally posted by stoker
    the politians say we the public are behind the games i vote no.
    any one out there care to vote.
    The problem with holding the games in England is that the English want it on the cheap. They should've given it to Edinburgh - at least the Scots are straightforward enough to either be too much of a bunch of misers to want to do it at all, or see a good marketing opportunity and do it right. None of your Southern Jessie complaining and skiving with them.

    Richard
  3. Standard member asromacalcio
    asromacalcio
    26 Aug '08 12:37
    Originally posted by stoker
    the politians say we the public are behind the games i vote no.
    any one out there care to vote.
    We have to wait and see, it's not all about money, if tastefully done the money won't matter, we can do a good Olympics for £9bn, my concern is it's all been far too Blue Peter so far, bubblegum graphics and scruffy dancing, candyfloss and carrier bags... the commendable approach to all-inclusiveness forgot to include any style. I'm ALL for giving people opportunities but can we really let college students and drama majors take over the design of such an important event.

    So, I'm behind the games 100% but DREAD the 80s fashion statement it will probably make.
  4. 27 Aug '08 09:07
    Originally posted by asromacalcio
    [bdone the money won't matter, we can do a good Olympics for £9bn,

    So, I'm behind the games 100% but DREAD the 80s fashion statement it will probably make.[/b]
    i think the cost will be in reality 20bn.... and to a earlier post i would like scotland to host something
  5. 27 Aug '08 10:22
    Originally posted by stoker
    i think the cost will be in reality 20bn.... and to a earlier post i would like scotland to host something
    How about hosting a massive earthquake, and breaking off into the Atlantic ocean? Id pay 20 billion for that.
  6. 27 Aug '08 14:51
    Originally posted by asromacalcio
    ... DREAD the 80s fashion statement it will probably make.
    This hideous logo cost £400,000: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/other_sports/olympics_2012/6718243.stm

    I'm assuming most of the money was spent on a time machine to pilfer it from 1982.
  7. 27 Aug '08 22:01 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by stoker
    the politians say we the public are behind the games i vote no.
    any one out there care to vote.
    I say send them to Bagdad!!

    It will provide a whole other source of interest in watching the games. I can just imagine the guy with the torch dodging car boms and sniper fire as he makes his way into the stadium.....that is if he makes it all.

    Let the games begin!!
  8. Standard member asromacalcio
    asromacalcio
    29 Aug '08 12:04
    Originally posted by pootstick
    This hideous logo cost £400,000: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/other_sports/olympics_2012/6718243.stm

    I'm assuming most of the money was spent on a time machine to pilfer it from 1982.
    I also hear that Stock, Aitken and Waterman will be carrying the flame at the opening ceremony.
  9. 29 Aug '08 21:08
    NO from me as well
  10. 29 Aug '08 21:08
    Originally posted by whodey
    I say send them to Bagdad!!

    It will provide a whole other source of interest in watching the games. I can just imagine the guy with the torch dodging car boms and sniper fire as he makes his way into the stadium.....that is if he makes it all.

    Let the games begin!!
    thats nottingham
  11. 30 Aug '08 03:58
    Originally posted by Shallow Blue
    The problem with holding the games in England is that the English want it on the cheap.

    No - the problem is that most of the English don't want it at all.