Originally posted by shortcircuitI'll take a 7 day period where we win 3 against the Cards, 2 against the Cubs (though they look pretty bad) but lose 2 against the Pirates. If the Reds go at that pace, they'll be pouring champagne on each other in September (AGAIN).
Oh come now...if you can't beat the Pirates in May, you'll be beating yourself in September!! 😉
Originally posted by no1marauder"IF" is a mighty big word there, but sure, you are correct.
I'll take a 7 day period where we win 3 against the Cards, 2 against the Cubs (though they look pretty bad) but lose 2 against the Pirates. If the Reds go at that pace, they'll be pouring champagne on each other in September (AGAIN).
As I stated before, I think the Cardinals will win it.
Originally posted by PhlabibitNooooo, not by a long shot.
Cards are pretty much the NYY of NL, no?
They are a very winning franchise, with the best manager in the NL, possibly in both leagues.
They have a solid system up and down the organization.
They don't overspend or over pay for players (as do the Yankees frequently).
The Dodgers would be the closest match for longevity of success to the Yankees,
and for the ability to spend.
The Mets are probably the closest match to foolish spending practices.
Originally posted by shortcircuit
Nooooo, not by a long shot.
They are a very winning franchise, with the best manager in the NL, possibly in both leagues.
They have a solid system up and down the organization.
They don't overspend or over pay for players (as do the Yankees frequently).
The Dodgers would be the closest match for longevity of success to the Yankees,
and for the ability to spend.
The Mets are probably the closest match to foolish spending practices.