0 Day timeout + 28 day timebank

i am not sure that it is best. but i certainly think it worth a trial.

in personal and clan games those 80 move marathons are wonderful, and even the last moves need great consideration to give the best game.

but in a tournament - who cares who wins, just finish the damn thing! lots of people are waiting. you can bet dantes wont require 80 moves to assert dominance over the rest of us.

i think it worth experimenting with the timebank and see how far it can be cut back without timeouts dominating. maybe even 21 day would work.

i like this idea....it could be title...'for the most loyal to RHP'

I could do at least a 12 hour TO.
Gotta sleep sometime I guess.

flexmore I like your idea. I read your post after I made one on the Help and Site Ideas.

http://www.timeforchess.com/board/showthread.php?id=8796

What do you think??

Originally posted by flexmore
i am not sure that it is best. but i certainly think it worth a trial.

in personal and clan games those 80 move marathons are wonderful, and even the last moves need great consideration to give the best game.

but in a tournament - who cares who wins, just finish the damn thing! lots of people are waiting. you can bet dantes wont require 80 moves to ...[text shortened]... k and see how far it can be cut back without timeouts dominating. maybe even 21 day would work.

Originally posted by rapalla7
I could do at least a 12 hour TO.
Gotta sleep sometime I guess.

Originally posted by flexmore
i am not sure that it is best. but i certainly think it worth a trial.

in personal and clan games those 80 move marathons are wonderful, and even the last moves need great consideration to give the best game.

but in a tournament - who cares who wins, just finish the damn thing! lots of people are waiting. you can bet dantes wont require 80 moves to ...[text shortened]... k and see how far it can be cut back without timeouts dominating. maybe even 21 day would work.