19 Jul '09 04:09>
A queen handicap basically can't be overcome unless the other player blunders their queen or multiple pieces. No, I wouldn't find a win like that very glorious.
A pawn up is huge. If everything else is equal, it can be a winning advantage. You have to respect the pawns.
Trev's point, "a 400 points gap is a lot different between a 1200 and 1600 rating and a 1600 and 2000 ratings," is a good one. I think the handicaps I proposed are probably pretty close to reality for high rated players (they are based on master play), but might not be for us. The difference in the two gaps mentioned might not be much of an issue though as it doesn't look like there's many higher rated players interested.
I would be willing to go with Thomaster's suggestion - "Goliath, looses one point for every 100 points difference in rating. Goliath can choose which pieces he drops.
(pawn = 1, knight/bishop = 3, rook = 5, queen = 9)."
- if we make it 2-game matches like in duels (dropping draw odds).
A pawn up is huge. If everything else is equal, it can be a winning advantage. You have to respect the pawns.
Trev's point, "a 400 points gap is a lot different between a 1200 and 1600 rating and a 1600 and 2000 ratings," is a good one. I think the handicaps I proposed are probably pretty close to reality for high rated players (they are based on master play), but might not be for us. The difference in the two gaps mentioned might not be much of an issue though as it doesn't look like there's many higher rated players interested.
I would be willing to go with Thomaster's suggestion - "Goliath, looses one point for every 100 points difference in rating. Goliath can choose which pieces he drops.
(pawn = 1, knight/bishop = 3, rook = 5, queen = 9)."
- if we make it 2-game matches like in duels (dropping draw odds).