1. Joined
    26 May '02
    Moves
    72546
    21 Apr '04 17:53
    The new Elite1 tournament is described as being for players rated over 1900, but the minimum rating has not been set. One player, rated under 1200, has already entered. Can this be rectified? Because this could be the tournament of the top players that many have asked for.

    Dave
  2. Amsterdam
    Joined
    26 Jan '03
    Moves
    27540
    21 Apr '04 18:44
    I already noticed it, but you beat me to post about it....

    I'll drop Russ a note... 🙂

    Mind if I enter the tournament? 😉

    Olav
  3. SubscriberRuss
    RHP Code Monkey
    RHP HQ
    Joined
    21 Feb '01
    Moves
    2417
    21 Apr '04 19:141 edit
    All fixed now. Thanks to those who alerted this.
    -Russ
  4. Zeist, Holland
    Joined
    11 Sep '03
    Moves
    19384
    22 Apr '04 08:42
    Nope, not fixed. On the tournaments page it says rating n/a-n/a, and on the 'Elite I' page it says ratings 1900-0. Bit confusing, that.
  5. Amsterdam
    Joined
    26 Jan '03
    Moves
    27540
    22 Apr '04 20:59
    It's good enough...! 🙂
  6. Standard memberskeeter
    515 + 30 days
    Account suspended
    Joined
    08 Mar '03
    Moves
    38202
    23 Apr '04 11:14
    Originally posted by LivingLegend
    It's good enough...! 🙂
    Apparently not. As at time of post two entries only out of an eligible pool of some 30 players.

    skeeter
  7. Standard membertejo
    a unique loser
    LIAAA
    Joined
    08 Oct '03
    Moves
    15848
    23 Apr '04 12:55
    I guess the timeout is too short, at least for me it is. I think most top players require a timeout of at least 3 days, but maybe even 7. For me it has to be 7 days and the 14 day timebank
  8. DonationQuirine
    Tovenaar
    Dieren
    Joined
    20 Apr '02
    Moves
    355136
    23 Apr '04 13:06
    Originally posted by tejo
    I guess the timeout is too short, at least for me it is. I think most top players require a timeout of at least 3 days, but maybe even 7. For me it has to be 7 days and the 14 day timebank
    for me any time-out will do, though I prefer 3 days, but I want the timebank at least 21 days and the only reason for that is:
    It's impossible to take a vacation here at RHP. A game can last up to a year (don't say it doesn't happen, because anyone who plays skeeter knows better)🙂 and personally I think even 21 days vacation in a year is not much to say the least...

    Otto
  9. Standard membertejo
    a unique loser
    LIAAA
    Joined
    08 Oct '03
    Moves
    15848
    26 Apr '04 14:26
    Russ, I think you need to increase the timeout, because I don't think it will start
  10. DonationChris
    Site Admin
    Wimbledon
    Joined
    21 Feb '01
    Moves
    26275
    26 Apr '04 16:47
    Originally posted by tejo
    Russ, I think you need to increase the timeout, because I don't think it will start
    I have increased the timeout to seven days to attract more players.

    -Chris
  11. Standard membertejo
    a unique loser
    LIAAA
    Joined
    08 Oct '03
    Moves
    15848
    26 Apr '04 17:47
    Originally posted by Chrismo
    I have increased the timeout to seven days to attract more players.

    -Chris
    Perfect. I have already joined. Thanks Chrismo
  12. Joined
    28 Jul '03
    Moves
    6272
    26 Apr '04 23:31
    Originally posted by tejo
    Perfect. I have already joined. Thanks Chrismo
    Meeee tooooo! 😲

    However, we need some more heavy hitters like Tejo to join so they can slap us 1900s around a little bit. Let's get some more of the *real* elite in this one.

    Cheers - "Cletus Awreetus Awrightus"
  13. Standard memberflexmore
    Quack Quack Quack !
    Chesstralia
    Joined
    18 Aug '03
    Moves
    54533
    27 Apr '04 12:29

    as an 8 player tournament the second round is quite possibly going to be a draw.

    if it was a 12 player tournament it would be much less likely that a draw would result in the second round.

    - and more good players get their boot in.
  14. Joined
    21 Feb '04
    Moves
    18112
    02 May '04 19:30
    Originally posted by flexmore

    as an 8 player tournament the second round is quite possibly going to be a draw.

    if it was a 12 player tournament it would be much less likely that a draw would result in the second round.

    - and more good players get their boot in.
    Agreed. Bigger elite tournaments would be nice, perhaps with a "RHP Championship" attached? You could have an open and a closed.

    I do have one question though: how come I got stuck in the wild moose half of the draw? I feel some humiliating loses coming on.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree