30 Sep 15
Originally posted by SeitseAnd yes, I am disgusted by flabby, whiny blobs like Caissad4, both
here and in real life. Is he a tumor? If moderators are surgeons and
users are either tumors, dead tissue or harmless growths, then you
can pretty much say, yes, the metaphor stands.
I don't think you mean this. I think you're still just trying to be funny.
30 Sep 15
Originally posted by SeitseCan i ask why you don't have a filter?
...I have no filter and, whether you like it
or not, it provides me with endless laughs --and, hopefully, others
too. How many? Couldn't care less.
As for this tiresome drama, I do think that people throwing tantrums,
giving ultimatums to the site owners, bringing their personal beef out
in the public, and manipulating the system to fit their leans, li ...[text shortened]... rguing
for the sake of it.
Don't dig deeper. I promise I won't kick a dead horse this time.[/b]
Not sure if you enjoy good coffee, but to try and make it without a filter you are just left with something undrinkable. I think your own 'brand of coffee' would be much more palatable to a lot more people if you did filter out the stuff that wasn't fit for human consumption.
Originally posted by SeitseThis is a fascinating post. Not because of what you've written, but because you got 3 thumbs up by the unprincipled people who dislike FMF more than they dislike what you wrote.
That is a matter of opinion. For example, I think you're an unoriginal
douche. A free rider one, for that matter.
What is a fact is that caissad4 threw his toys out of the pram, put
forward an ultimatum to the site owners, and made his personal
thingy a matter of the whole general forum --as if everybody should
care about his idiocy.
30 Sep 15
Originally posted by KeggeI disagree. The forum moderation here is generally OK but occasionally they goof up, which then allows a few threads to descend into farce. Like this one. These farce threads are usually some of the best here.
Forum moderation on this site is a farce. One of the reasons I hardly participate in the slugfests. It doesn't matter at all if you alert a post. Not one action has been undertaken to any of the posts I have alerted. All alerted posts were breaching forum rules. Clearly site owner doesn't care one bit about the toxicity that goes rampage on these forums. I ful ...[text shortened]... the chess part of the site, that I do support, I would not pay for the subscription any longer.
Originally posted by SeitseWhereas your behaviour is the epitome of forum etiquette, incisive wit and intellectual envelope pushing I suppose?
As for this tiresome drama, I do think that people throwing tantrums, giving ultimatums to the site owners, bringing their personal beef out in the public, and manipulating the system to fit their leans, likes, dislikes, and preferences, are disgusting.
Originally posted by divegeesterYou are building false dichotomies.
Whereas your behaviour is the epitome of forum etiquette, incisive wit and intellectual envelope pushing I suppose?
Opposites of good taste and etiquette could be raunchiness or vulgarity,
not puritanical, vendetta-fueled tantrums and ultimatum throwing.
I am 100% vulgar. Certified. But I am not a whiny little tramp spamming
the GF about DF beefs, and blackmailing the site owners to get my way.
Check Merriam Webster. Also, there are sites on synonyms and antonyms.
Originally posted by SeitseIt's simply inconceivable that you have somehow built up such a deep malice for an individual poster - in this case cassaid4 - that it's got you making these visceral personal remarks about her. It just seems ludicrous. It must be you trying to make people laugh at your vulgarity - even now as you pretend to be serious. It can't be for real.
I am 100% vulgar. Certified. But I am not a whiny little tramp spamming the GF about DF beefs, and blackmailing the site owners to get my way.
01 Oct 15
Originally posted by FMFOriginal post by Subscriber Finnegan "on 14 Sep '15 07:32"
Do you think cassaid4 was within her rights to protest in the way she did about abusive posts aimed at her?
Stop the trolls Thread 165567
Originally posted by Grampy BobbySo are you not able to say whether or not cassaid4 is a "troll" here on this forum... because you said something unctuous on another forum? Does cassaid4 rank among "...some human beings [who] are hypersensitive to their own wishes and needs" or not?
Original post by Subscriber Finnegan "on 14 Sep '15 07:32"
[b]Stop the trolls Thread 165567[/b]
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyDo you have a list of site members you see as "trolls" whom you think should receive a forum ban and for how long should the ban be?
1)Which active site member should receive a forum ban; for how long; and why referencing RHP Terms of Service or Forum Guidelines?
01 Oct 15
Originally posted by SeitseWe'll get to the Merriam Webster in just a minute, sir. A moment ago said that you ordered Kendrick to order his men not to touch Santiago. But now you are saying he looked good in a faggotty white uniform, is that it?
Check Merriam Webster. Also, there are sites on synonyms and antonyms.