Originally posted by FMFBut what is your actual objection to using the words 'absolute truth'?
I don't really use either. I just used the expression 'unchanging truth' in my previous post because you asked me to use it. You seem to have declined the invitation to run some of your own past me. I certainly don't use the term "absolute truth" in the way you do, which is to attempt to lend some gravitas to your superstitious notions and opinions about supernatural things.
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkTwo things: [1] the way you use it, which I frankly find ridiculous; so it's no use to you and me for communication, except that you using it indicates you are making pompous or pretentious claims about your superstitions ~ weren't you using it as a synonym for "universal truth"?; and [2] I don't need it, so why would I use it?
But what is your actual objection to using the words 'absolute truth'?
Originally posted by FMFObviously you find my use of it ridiculous because you don't share my beliefs. Out of interest, when you were a Christian, did you believe your Christianity was only relatively true to Christians or did you believe it was universally true?
Two things: [1] the way you use it, which I frankly find ridiculous; so it's no use to you and me for communication, except that you using it indicates you are making pompous or pretentious claims about your superstitions ~ weren't you using as a synonym for "universal truth"?; and [2] I don't need it, so why would I use it?
28 Apr 17
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkAnd I don't give too hoots how many times you insist that your personal opinions are "universal truths". It'd be like me insisting that you not hold Christian beliefs because my take on things is "universal". Of course it's ridiculous.
Obviously you find my use of it ridiculous because you don't share my beliefs.
28 Apr 17
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkI don't go around using the term "universally true" and I don't remember using it in the past.
Out of interest, when you were a Christian, did you believe your Christianity was only relatively true to Christians or did you believe it was universally true?
Originally posted by FMFObviously they are to me it would be silly to pretend otherwise. What exactly is the point of believing in relative truth? That is absolutely meaningless to me. 🙂
And I don't give too hoots how many times you insist that your personal opinions are "universal truths". It'd be like me insisting that you not hold Christian beliefs because my take on things is "universal". Of course it's ridiculous.
28 Apr 17
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkJust as your claims about the "absolute" and "universal truth" of your notions about angels, demons and divine beings are meaningless to me, aside from letting me know what kind of superstitions you have.
Obviously they are to me it would be silly to pretend otherwise. What exactly is the point of believing in relative truth? That is absolutely meaningless to me. 🙂
Originally posted by FMFYou clearly seem to take offense at the use of the words 'universal truth', I wonder why that is?
And I don't give too hoots how many times you insist that your personal opinions are "universal truths". It'd be like me insisting that you not hold Christian beliefs because my take on things is "universal". Of course it's ridiculous.
28 Apr 17
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkYou simply asserting that your superstitions are "true" does not make them "universal" in any sense other than a subjective one, no matter how much you gird your ideological loins with adjectives brandishing your personal certainty. Your beliefs and my beliefs about the supernatural dimension do not rise much above the rank of conjecture and opinions, If you want to declare your superstitions to be somehow true for everyone, and that helps you lead your life - then, good for you.
Truth by nature is universal. Whether you like it or not.
28 Apr 17
Originally posted by FMFHow about a lunar lander was never tested successfully on the earth, and an astronaut nearly died in the test.
Give me a scenario. I've never seen or experienced a miracle.
Yet it worked successfully the first time it went 234,000 miles away on the Moon.
And five more times without a glitch, each time with two cheery human beings inside.