01 May 17
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkWhy should I try to "convince" you of anything above and beyond what I already say and talk about and express interest in?
That fact that you question everyone else's beliefs yet don't seem to even attempt to convince anyone of your own, seems to indicate that you have no conviction of your beliefs being true.
Originally posted by FMFMaybe you would be in a better position to tell me what the consequences of your beliefs are? How should I know? What an odd question.
I am not asking you what your perspective is about me. I am asking you what is the consequence for me of you believing your "universal truth" applies to me, whereas I do not?
Originally posted by FMFObviously we have different takes on truth and its implications. If you feel you don't have to convince me of your beliefs why should I even start to think that you are convinced of them yourself?
Why should I try to "convince" you of anything above and beyond what I already say and talk about and express interest in?
01 May 17
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkI am asking what you think the consequences of your beliefs are for me. You said they were "universally true" so you must therefore believe they are of some "universal" consequence that applies to me, right?
Maybe you would be in a better position to tell me what the consequences of your beliefs are? How should I know? What an odd question.
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkBut what does it matter to either of us whether or not you are convinced by my beliefs ~ or indeed whether or not you think I am convinced about my own?
Obviously we have different takes on truth and its implications. If you feel you don't have to convince me of your beliefs why should I even start to think that you are convinced of them yourself?
Originally posted by FMFObviously if I believe my beliefs are true then it means one consequence of you not sharing my beliefs, from my perspective, would be that you would are deceived and do not believe in the truth.
I am asking what you think the consequences of your beliefs are for me. You said they were "universally true" so you must therefore believe they are of some "universal" consequence that applies to me, right?
01 May 17
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkThat is still a consequence for you - about what you think - about what you think about what I believe etc. - I am asking what consequence do your beliefs have for me in my life - something experienced, felt or perceived by me.
Obviously if I believe my beliefs are true then it means one consequence of you not sharing my beliefs, from my perspective, would be that you would are deceived and do not believe in the truth.
01 May 17
Originally posted by FMFTruth does not have to matter to everyone for it to be universal. For example, that fact that I fell off my bicycle and bruised my nutsack when I was 4 is the truth, but it surely does not matter to anyone who is not aware of it.
If it only matters to you, in what credible sense, shape or form, can it be said to be "universal"?
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkYou have personal knowledge of falling off your bike. You have no such personal knowledge about God or the creation of the universe, to justify any truth claims..
Truth does not have to matter to everyone for it to be universal. For example, that fact that I fell off my bicycle and bruised my nutsack when I was 4 is the truth, but it surely does not matter to anyone who is not aware of it.
01 May 17
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkSo what do you actually think you are achieving with regard to everyone when you declare that your superstitious beliefs about supernatural things constitute "universal truths"?
Truth does not have to matter to everyone for it to be universal.
If it has no consequence to me, for example, that you declare your beliefs to be "universal truths", what is your purpose for doing it when you talk to me?