2026 Clan Rules - agreed upon by the 2025 Clan Leaders

@Very-Rusty said
That is your Prerogative Sir, look where I have made fun of someone's memory!!!

Get back to me on that with the specific quote I made, Thank you kindly, in advance.

-VR

Didn't take long. You posted this 3 days ago in debates:


"Did you always have a bit of brain damage or just after you became a Trump Cultist???

-VR'


Edit: At least Trev was subtle about it.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
Didn't take long. You posted this 3 days ago in debates:


"Did you always have a bit of brain damage or just after you became a Trump Cultist???

-VR'

You are talking about my reply to a Poster who has been a Trump supporter and has told lie after lie on this site and has been pointed out by other members such as Sonhouse, Suzianne, among other poster's and has constantly been a negative poster on this site. So, not just my opinion the opinion of others also. If you choose to defend him that is also your prerogative Sir.

EDIT to your EDIT: Trevor is never subtle in any way shape or form. That was a direct underhanded jab as you like to put it!!!

-VR

@Very-Rusty said
You are talking about my reply to a Poster who has been a Trump supporter and has told lie after lie on this site and has been pointed out my other members such as Sonhouse, Suzianne, among other poster's and has constantly been a negative poster on this site. So, not just my opinion the opinion of others also. If you choose to defend him that is also your prerogative Sir. ...[text shortened]... subtle in any way shape or form. That was a direct underhanded jab as you like to put it!!!

-VR

I'll remind you of what you said:

"To reiterate I do not believe there is anything funny about making jabs about someone's memory, EVER!!! That is a very low and classless act in my very humble opinion.
VERY RUSTY
-VR"


Apparently this doesn't apply to yourself.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
I'll remind you of what you said:

"To reiterate I do not believe there is anything funny about making jabs about someone's memory, EVER!!! That is a very low and classless act in my very humble opinion.
VERY RUSTY
-VR"


Apparently this doesn't apply to yourself.

Obviously you are nit picking now, as posters have said exactly what I have said about that particular member, I have not seen you question either of the Posters I mentioned. Obviously you just have an issue with me. You are ok if Trevor makes fun of someone with memory issues, or if someone calls some one names so long as it isn't Very Rusty, That Sir, I call very bias of you!!!!

You/we are also getting off of the subject of this thread as did Trevor when questioning my memory. Perhaps, let Trevor speak for himself in the future? He is quite capable I might add, Sir.

-VR

@Very-Rusty said
Obviously you are nit picking now, as posters have said exactly what I have said about that particular member, I have not seen you question either of the Posters I mentioned. Obviously you just have an issue with me. You are ok if Trevor makes fun of someone with memory issues, or if someone calls some one names so long as it isn't Very Rusty, That Sir, I call very bias of ...[text shortened]... y. Perhaps, let Trevor speak for himself in the future? He is quite capable I might add, Sir.

-VR

Hey, it was you who said it was never ok to make fun of someone's memory. When you make such statements you better be sure there's no mud on your own shoes. (Which there clearly was).

And if we are talking about a lack of class, i think it is just as bad to make fun of someone's low chess rating, something i have seen you do on numerous occasions.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
Hey, it was you who said it was never ok to make fun of someone's memory. When you make such statements you better be sure there's no mud on your own shoes. (Which there clearly was).

And if we are talking about a lack of class, i think it is just as bad to make fun of someone's low chess rating, something i have seen you do on numerous occasions.

No Sir, I said for you to find a quote where I did so, and I explained to you why and other posters who had questioned that Poster's memory as well, who you did not say anything to. You seem to have a chip on your shoulder and an issue with me.

You didn't say anything to Trevor, suzianne or sonhouse. I call that very telling of you issues with me but not with any of them saying something very similar.

Again, You are the one now keeping the Thread off Subject that it was intended. I give my apologies to the OP of this thread. The subject matter for what it was intended is indeed important to the Clan Challenges.

-VR

@Very-Rusty said
No Sir, I said for you to find a quote where I did so, and I explained to you why and other posters who had questioned that Poster's memory as well, who you did not say anything to. You seem to have a chip on your shoulder and an issue with me.

You didn't say anything to Trevor, suzianne or sonhouse. I call that very telling of you issues with me but not with any of th ...[text shortened]... read. The subject matter for what it was intended is indeed important to the Clan Challenges.

-VR

Apology accepted. Let's move on.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
Apology accepted. Let's move on.

I was not apologizing to you, Sir. I was apologizing to the OP of the Subject matter of this thread. I didn't see any input from you as he asked you directly in his first post.

-VR

@Very-Rusty said
I was not apologizing to you, Sir. I was apologizing to the OP of the Subject matter of this thread. I didn't see any input from you as he asked you directly in his first post.

-VR

He wasn't asking me, he was quoting me.

But I appreciate the apology.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
He wasn't asking me, he was quoting me.

But I appreciate the apology.

Correction Sir, he was asking not quoting. This is what he asked you word for word

GOAD: "What if the new rules had a lower fixed limit on how many challenges could be played in a given year?"

Again the apology was to the OP not YOU, Sir. Perhaps it is clearer to you now?

-VR

@Very-Rusty said
Correction Sir, he was asking not quoting. This is what he asked you word for word

GOAD: "What if the new rules had a lower fixed limit on how many challenges could be played in a given year?"

Again the apology was to the OP not YOU, Sir. Perhaps it is clearer to you now?

-VR

He was quoting something I had said/asked in a different thread. (Hence the quotation marks).

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
He was quoting something I had said in a different thread. (Hence the quotation marks).

@Ghost of a Duke,

He asked you a direct question which has went unanswered by you Sir, In THIS THREAD!!!

Are you just trying to dodge the question he asked Directly to you? Your thoughts on how many challenges would be acceptable were asked in sincerity I believe.

-VR

@Very-Rusty said
@Ghost of a Duke,

He asked you a direct question which has went unanswered by you Sir, In THIS THREAD!!!

Are you just trying to dodge the question he asked Directly to you? Your thoughts on how many challenges would be acceptable were asked in sincerity I believe.

-VR

He was quoting a question I had asked in a different thread.

Not sure why you are not understanding that.


Edit: You want me to answer my own question?

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
He was quoting a question I had asked in a different thread.

Not sure why you are not understanding that.


Edit: You want me to answer my own question?

@Ghost,

He did ask you in THIS THREAD...>What your opinion was! That Sir, is entirely up to you if you answer it or not.

At least acknowledge the question put forward by him.

-VR

@Very-Rusty said
@Ghost of a Duke,

He asked you a direct question which has went unanswered by you Sir, In THIS THREAD!!!

Are you just trying to dodge the question he asked Directly to you? Your thoughts on how many challenges would be acceptable were asked in sincerity I believe.

-VR

Look at the top of page 11 in the thread '2024 Completed.'

I asked the question there.


(Bish took my question and copied it here for further discussion. He credited it to me. He wasn't asking me my own question).